Entertainment Magazine

Making Sense of the Emmys in the Peak TV Era

Posted on the 22 September 2019 by Weminoredinfilm.com @WeMinoredInFilm

It's September 22, 2019. Tonight, Hollywood honors all of the best TV shows of the past year which aired between June 1, 2018 and May 31, 2019. We do this every year. It's called the Emmy Awards. However, as I look at the list of nominees and ponder the standard who will win vs. who should win pontificating I'm struck by how many shows didn't even make the cut.

For example, how dare they snub Amazon's groundbreaking Undone! Or Netflix's Unbelievable!

(Um, those just came out last weekend. They'll be eligible next year.)

Oh, right. Right, right, right. But what about Amazon's gritty Garth Ennis adaptation The Boys? I mean, come on, it's a gamechanger for superhero TV.

(Yeah, it came out in July. It's eligible next year, but even so, it probably won't get any love. Too niche.)

Huh. I'm sensing a pattern here. Let me try harder. How dare they overlook, um, um, David Tennant's comic tour de force performance as Crowley in Amazon's The Good Omens?

Like what?

(Let me see: something called Best Fantasy/Sci-Fi Costumes, which is absolutely a real category and not something I just made up. Also, it's nominated for Outstanding Original Main Title Them Song.)

You're damn right it is! Totally deserving.

Alright, so that was a May 31st show. Let me think further back.

How dare they snub, um, oh I've got it - FX's What We Do in the Shadows!

(Gold star! As a late-March premiere, What We Do in the Shadows was completely eligible for any comedy awards but didn't receive a single Emmy nomination. But, really, with Barry, Fleabag, The Good Place, Marvelous Mrs. Maisel, and Veep this is one of the worst years in Emmy history to be a brand new show trying to crack into the comedy categories.)

Ah phooey. That does at least explain why my petition to get The Expanse: Season 3 nominated for Best Drama didn't attract any signatures.

Most of what I watch is probably more Hugo/Saturn than Emmy TV, isn't it?

(Let's see: Legends of Tomorrow, Star Trek: Discovery, Years and Years, The Twilight Zone, The Umbrella Academy, The Haunting of HIll House, The Magicians, Lucifer, Supernatural, Doom Patrol, and, of course, The Boys and Good Omens. Yeah, they don't have a snowball's chance in hell at a major Emmy.)

What genre show does?

( Game of Thrones)

Making Sense of the Emmys in the Peak TV Era

Really? But that last season was so, so bad.

(Hey, that second episode with Jamie knighting Brienne had everyone crying. Plus, the Lord of the Rings: Return of the King rule is in full effect here: you don't fret over honoring something like this for its least-compelling installment; you simply hold your nose and vote for it anyway because the overall, truly historic achievement of it all needs to be recognized.)

I'm not just the nerdy TV show guy, though. I'm an adult. I have leather-bound books and bills to pay, and I appreciate prestige TV shows like Killing Eve and Important with a capital "I" HBO Documentaries. Tell me, is that Michael Jackson doc, Leaving Neverland, up for anything?

Huh. All great, really, but what about The Case Against Adnan Syed?

Making Sense of the Emmys in the Peak TV Era

(Nominated for a single writing award, which it lost.)

WTF? That documentary is a monumental achievement in documentary filmmaking. It's a scathing indictment of institutional racism and injustice as well as a fascinating journalistic follow-up on what happens when someone becomes the darling of true crime enthusiasts but is quickly forgotten since the wheels of justice move slowly, if ever at all.

(Guess what - everything is a "monumental achievement" now. Hollywood produced 500 scripted TV shows last year and who knows how many unscripted ones. In that avalanche of content, there's a lot of bad, a fair deal of fluff, plenty of passable entertainment, and an overwhelming amount of amazing. In this era, your favorite show is usually whatever you binged last night because no matter how good your latest obsession might be there's always something just as good if not better on the way. For example, you were pretty blown away by Mahershela Ali's turn as the taciturn, Alzheimer's afflicted lead of the most recent True Detective?)

Yeah.

Wait - and this feels like something you would normally say - Unbelievable and Mindhunter: Season 2 aren't eligible for this year's Emmys.

(Correct. But that's exactly the confusion of the Emmys. We live in a streaming era where new shows can drop in their entirety at any given moment, yet the Emmys are still built around the old, traditional broadcast schedule where the season ends at the end of May and awards are handed out based on the merits of a single episode submitted for consideration instead of the larger body of work. The networks and streamers know this and can sometimes game the system, like dropping their show on the last day of eligibility to make sure it's the freshest thing in the minds of voters or delaying a new season until the next eligibility period to avoid having to compete with a behemoth like Game of Thrones.)

(That might not have been the determining factor, but it definitely was a factor.)

Huh.

(The Emmys are weird. Unlike The Oscars, which operates in a far more structured awards season with plenty of pre-cursor awards like the Golden Globes and a general expectation that only the movies released in the limited October-December time frame will be nominated, The Emmys arrive with little to no precursors and must hand out awards at a time when new shows which might win awards the following year are already premiering. It muddies the water in a way the Oscars never have to worry about.)

So we should just ignore them?

(Not necessarily. In the peak TV era, what we need more than ever is curation, and that's what the Emmys provide. If you still haven't gotten around to Chernobyl, Fosse/Verdon, When They See Us, or Bodyguard, the Emmys are telling you that even in a sea of endless awesome TV, those shows are especially worth your time. Also, if you'e been sleeping on Killing Eve or Russian Doll, well, stop. If you're still several seasons behind Better Call Saul, it's helpful to know that they've all been Emmy-nominated and thus do not appear to go downhill at all.)

What about all the snubs? And the whole "the stuff you watch wouldn't get nominated" anyway?

(It's not exactly like the Emmys telling you to watch Bodyguard is like a parent forcing a child to eat their vegetables. That show is a damn soap opera - a tense, sexy, thrilling soap opera and thus not exactly the hardest thing to sit through.)

Can I just go back to binging Undone now? She just told her boyfriend...

(Dude, spoilers!)

Um, it's been out a week. Everyone's watched it already.

Touche.

(Aren't you curious to see who will win Emmys tonight? Or who you'd want to win if you could vote?)

Sure. I'll give it a shot.

Outstanding Drama Series

Making Sense of the Emmys in the Peak TV Era

  • Better Call Saul
  • Bodyguard
  • Game of Thrones
  • Killing Eve
  • Ozark
  • Pose
  • Succession
  • This Is Us

What I'd Vote For: Killing Eve

What Else I Would Have Nominated: What Will Win: Game of Thrones The Deuce

Outstanding Comedy Series

What Else I Would Have Nominated: GLOW, What We Do in the Shadows

Making Sense of the Emmys in the Peak TV Era

  • Barry
  • Fleabag
  • The Good Place
  • The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel
  • Russian Doll
  • Schitt's Creek
  • Veep

What I'd Vote For: Fleabag

What Else I Would Have Nominated: What Will Win: When They See Us Maniac, Good Omens, The Haunting of Hill House

Outstanding Limited Series

Making Sense of the Emmys in the Peak TV Era

  • Chernobyl
  • Escape at Dannemora
  • Fosse/Verdon
  • Sharp Objects
  • When They See Us

What I'd Vote For: When They See Us

Outstanding Drama Actress

Making Sense of the Emmys in the Peak TV Era

  • Emilia Clarke, Game of Thrones
  • Jodie Comer, Killing Eve
  • Viola Davis, How to Get Away With Murder
  • Laura Linney, Ozark
  • Mandy Moore, This Is Us
  • Sandra Oh, Killing Eve
  • Robin Wright, House of Cards

Who I Would Vote For: Jodie Comer

Who Else I Would Have Nominated: Christine Baranski for The Good Fight

Who Will Win: Sandra Oh

Outstanding Drama Actor

Making Sense of the Emmys in the Peak TV Era

Who I Would Vote For: Kit Harrington

Who Else I Would Have Nominated: Ramy Youssef for Hulu's Ramy

Who Will Win: Jason Bateman? Feels like a total toss-up.

Outstanding Comedy Actress

Making Sense of the Emmys in the Peak TV Era

Who I Would Vote For: Christina Applegate or Phoebe Waller-Bridge

Who Else I Would Have Nominated: Linda Cardellini for Dead to Me, Natasia Demetriou for What We Do in the Shadows, Alison Brie for GLOW

Who Will Win: It's a three-way race between Brosnahan, Louis-Dreyfus and Waller-Bridge. This is the last time they'll ever be able to award either Louis-Dreyfus or Waller-Bridge for playing their characters since their respective shows each ended. In a race like that, I'd favor the sentimental favorite over the new kid, and in this case that means Julia Louis-Dreyfus.

Outstanding Comedy Actor

Making Sense of the Emmys in the Peak TV Era

Who I Would Vote For: Bill Hader

Who Else I Would Have Nominated: James Marsden for Dead to Me

Who Will Win: Bill Hader

Outstanding Lead Actress in a Limited Series/Movie

Making Sense of the Emmys in the Peak TV Era

Who I Would Vote For: Michelle Williams

Who Else I Would Have Nominated: Emma Stone for Maniac and any of the Haunting of Hill House sisters

Who Will Win: Patricia Arquette

Outstanding Lead Actor in a Limited Series/Movie

Making Sense of the Emmys in the Peak TV Era

Who I Would Vote For: Mahershela Ali

Who Else I Would Have Nominated: David Tennant and Michael Sheen for Good Omens, Oliver Jackson-Cohen for The Haunting of Hill House

Who Will Win: Jharrel Jerome

Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series

Making Sense of the Emmys in the Peak TV Era

Who I Would Vote For: Maisie Williams

Who Else I Would Have Nominated: Sarah Snook for Succession

Who Will Win: Julia Garner

Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Drama Series

Making Sense of the Emmys in the Peak TV Era

  • Jonathan Banks, Better Call Saul
  • Giancarlo Esposito, Better Call Saul
  • Alfie Allen, Game of Thrones
  • Nikolaj Coster-Waldau, Game of Thrones
  • Peter Dinklage, Game of Thrones
  • Michael Kelly, House of Cards
  • Chris Sullivan, This Is Us

Who I Would Vote For: Peter Dinklage

Who Else I Would Have Nominated: Kieran Culkin for Succession

Who Will Win: Peter Dinklage

Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Comedy Series

Making Sense of the Emmys in the Peak TV Era

  • Sarah Goldberg, Barry
  • Sian Clifford, Fleabag
  • Olivia Coleman, Fleabag
  • Betty Gilpin, GLOW
  • Alex Borstein, Marvelous Mrs. Maisel
  • Marin Hinkle, Marvelous Mrs. Maisel
  • Kate McKinnon, Saturday Night Live
  • Anna Chlumsky, Veep

Who I Would Vote For: Sarah Goldberg

Who Else I Would Have Nominated: D'Arcy Carden for The Good Place

Who Will Win: Alex Borstein

Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series

Making Sense of the Emmys in the Peak TV Era

Who I Would Vote For: Anthony Carrigan

Who Else I Would Have Nominated: Andrew Scott as Fleabag 's hot priest

Who Will Win: Henry Wrinkler

Your turn. Who do you think will/should win? And which shows would you pick if only they'd be nominated? Let me know in the comments.

Making Sense of the Emmys in the Peak TV Era

Grew up obsessing over movies and TV shows. Worked in a video store. Minored in film at college because my college didn't offer a film major. Worked in academia for a while. Have been freelance writing and running this blog since 2013. View all posts by Kelly Konda


Back to Featured Articles on Logo Paperblog