Dating Magazine

There Is No Universal Definition Of “Cheating”

By Brute Reason @sondosia
There Is No Universal Definition Of “Cheating”

A very disturbing thing I found here.

Every time I read a women’s website or magazine these days, I come upon a headline that demands to know, “IS THIS CHEATING?!?!” Is sending flirty Facebook messages to someone else cheating? Is sending them nude pics cheating? Is flirting cheating? Is there a chance you could actually be cheating on your boyfriend and not even realize it?

Technology seems to exacerbate these existential questions because it keeps giving us new ways to violate our partners’ trust (but, on the flipside, it keeps giving us new ways to be sexual). Coming up to someone in person and stripping naked is one thing; sending a nude photo of yourself to them is another (or feels like another). And so we have to have these endless conversations about what exactly cheating is.

Here’s the thing, though. If you’re reading a magazine article to find out if you cheated or not, you’re doing it wrong, because it can’t answer that question for you. The only person who can tell you that is your partner.

Nobody else can tell you what “cheating” means in your particular relationship because it’s different in each one. In monogamous relationships, most people take the “default” definition of cheating, which includes any sort of sexual contact with someone else. But even then, what about flirty Facebook messages? What about “emotional cheating,” when you have feelings for someone else (even if you don’t act on them)? Some people count these things as cheating; others don’t.

Monogamous relationships can have a lot of wiggle room, too. I’ve known many couples in which one partner is straight and the other is bisexual, and the straight partner doesn’t mind if the bisexual partner hooks up with people of their own gender (as long as it’s just hooking up). Long-distance relationships can also have certain “rules” for what the partners can do while they’re apart.

In non-monogamous relationships, there’s an even greater variety of configurations and definitions of cheating. Some couples restrict which types of sexual acts they can do outside of the primary relationship, or they specify that sex without barriers outside of that relationship would be cheating. Some people form triads or group marriages and forbid all sexual contact outside of that established group. Some decide that you can only hook up outside of the relationship at certain events or in particular spaces, or if your primary partner is present and either watching or participating.

Meanwhile, in other non-monogamous relationships–for instance, mine–the boundaries aren’t about specific acts or people, but rather about communication. If my partner or I act secretively about other people we’re seeing, we’re cheating. If we’re not considerate to each other in terms of making plans with those other people, we’re cheating.

But people don’t just come to these agreements by separately reading Cosmo articles about what cheating is and then never discussing it.

So, if you’re unsure of what counts as cheating in your relationship, you have three options:

1. Say nothing and avoid all activities that could possibly be considered cheating, thus potentially missing out on some great opportunities;

2. Say nothing and do whatever you feel like doing while convincing yourself that your partner wouldn’t see it as cheating, thus potentially, you know, cheating on your partner;

3. Ask your partner what they would like the boundaries of the relationship to be.

I can see why that third option might feel awkward or uncomfortable. If you ask your partner, “What are our boundaries as a couple? What could I potentially do that would make you feel like I cheated on you?”, there’s a chance that your partner will interpret that as you “looking for permission” to get involved in some way with other people. But if they understand the importance of communication in relationships, they’ll see it for what it is–an attempt to make sure that you’re on the same page and that neither of you will be hurt by a misunderstanding about relationship boundaries.

That’s also why it’s a good idea to have that discussion at the beginning of a relationship rather than once it’s been going on for a while, but late is definitely better than never.

The great thing about a discussion like this is that it also allows for discussing things that aren’t “cheating” per se, but nevertheless feel like a violation of boundaries. For some people, it’s not “cheating” if their partner flirts harmlessly (as in, with no intentions for anything else) with someone else, but they wouldn’t feel comfortable if their partner did that right in front of them. For some people–it’s hard for me to imagine this myself, but I’ve heard of it–it feels “wrong” somehow if their partner dances with someone else at a party. Some people would want to know if their partner develops a crush on someone else, but that doesn’t mean it’s “cheating” if they do. Nevertheless, finding out that their partner has been keeping a new crush secret would feel like a violation of trust.

All of these nuances can be made clear by a conversation about boundaries.

Prescriptive definitions of cheating (i.e. “this is what cheating must mean for everyone”) don’t serve anyone. They keep people stuck in a very restrictive version of monogamy (not that there’s anything wrong with monogamy, as long as you consciously choose it). They allow for misunderstandings that hurt people, such as when one partner thinks flirting with others is okay and the other feels like it’s cheating. They prevent people from creating their own relationship models that work best for them, and encourage them instead to conform to the dominant cultural conception of what a committed, “faithful” relationship is.

Back to Featured Articles on Logo Paperblog

These articles might interest you :

  • Without a Surface There is No Depth…

    Without Surface There Depth…

    Mona Lisa by Leonardo da VinciHeadlongI talked briefly about the importance of nuances when composing music in my post about Chaos and Beauty and the essence... Read more

    The 12 August 2012 by   Alreadydidit
  • There’s No Business Like News Business

    There’s Business Like News

    He actually asked some half decent questions. IT WAS CNN commentator Paul Begala who coined the phrase “politics is show business for ugly people” to describe... Read more

    The 16 October 2012 by   Ben Anderson
  • There Are No Wrong Reasons.

    There Wrong Reasons.

    Evyn was born with some serious health issues. I know I have mentioned that many times. I have not mentioned the year that followed his birth. During my... Read more

    The 07 February 2013 by   Accidentalxpert
  • Where There Is Tea, There's Hope*

    Where There Tea, There's Hope*

    Hi Everyone!Today was my 16th birthday I've had a great day so I am thinking of posting a 'What I got for my birthday' post, so I was just wondering if... Read more

    The 17 February 2013 by   Beaumaquillagex
  • Imagine There’s No Hunger 2012 – John Lennon Inspired Gifts That Combat Childhoo...

    Imagine There’s Hunger 2012 John Lennon Inspired Gifts That Combat Childhood

    Each year, the Hard Rock Cafe, Hotels, and Casinos, as well as, dedicate November and December to a wonderful cause: fighting childhood hunger and... Read more

    The 07 November 2012 by   Steveliu
  • There’s No Place Like Home…

    There’s Place Like Home…

    Day one of the Road trip home…We decided to take a detour to downtown Vancouver and check things out. I haven’t been downtown for a couple of years, since the... Read more

    The 07 December 2012 by   Redneckprincess
  • When There is No Integrity…

    When There Integrity…

    I never thought I would post anything about this. I thought I would be quiet, and not comment.Because I had faith. I had hope. I wanted to believe.That he wasn’... Read more

    The 19 January 2013 by   Redneckprincess

Add a comment