Media Magazine

Mishandling of the Petraeus Case Raises Profound Concerns

Posted on the 20 November 2012 by Alanbean @FOJ_TX
Mishandling of the Petraeus Case Raises Profound Concerns

FBI agent Frederick W. Humphries

By Alan Bean

Civil libertarians are expressing grave concerns about central aspects of the unfolding scandal involving General David Petraeus.  In particular, the role of FBI agent Frederick Humphries is raising eyebrows.

Consider this excerpt from a recent piece in the New York Times:

By all accounts, Mr. Humphries doggedly pursued Ms. Kelley’s cyberstalking complaint. Though he was not assigned to the case, he was admonished by supervisors who thought he was trying to improperly insert himself into the investigation.

In late October, fearing that the case was being stalled for political reasons, Mr. Humphries contacted Representative Dave Reichert, a Republican from Washington State, where the F.B.I. agent had worked previously, to inform him of the case. Mr. Reichert put him in touch with the House majority leader, Eric Cantor, who passed the message to Mr. Mueller.

Here we have a rouge agent going above the heads of his superiors to pursue an unauthorized investigation.  Then, without authorization, Humphries contacts his friends in Republican politics who can be counted on to take the matter directly to the Big Cheese, FBI Director Robert Mueller.

Agent Humphries, it seems, was acting as a friend of Jill Kelley, not in his official capacity.  Kelley has been described as a “Tampa socialite”, whatever that means.  Like Petraeus biographer Paula Broadwell, Kelley appears to be an attractive woman who collected prominent men the way some women collect tea pots.  

If Humphries was concerned about the content of the emails Kelley showed him, his responsibility was to refer the matter to the appropriate authorities and get out of the way.  That’s not what happened.  We can only be glad that Eric Cantor didn’t attempt to politicize this story prior to the election which, it seems, was Humphries’ hope and expectation.

But the concern goes deeper than that.  Much deeper.  If the email correspondence of the CIA Director can be hacked without his knowledge, none of us are safe.

I am not suggesting that Paula Broadwell’s reckless email correspondence with Ms. Kelley should have been ignored; but the issue shouldn’t have played out in the media until all the relevant facts had been ascertained.  Reporters were bound to sensationalize the story, and the gradual leaking of lurid details brought out the media’s most puerile tendencies.

But here’s the thing, can any overly zealous FBI agent access my private emails simply by asking the good folks at Google for a look-see?  Apparently so.  The right to privacy has died the death of a thousand qualifications since 9-11 and the Petraeus case simply illustrates how profound the erosion has been.

It is impossible to evaluate the claim that Paula Broadwell was in possession of “classified documents” since even documents of minor importance carry top secret status these days.  When the full truth comes out, I doubt we will find a broach of national security.

A reckless and ill-considered foreign policy threatens American national security far more than the tragically silly missteps of a star-crossed biographer.  When a compulsive panic over national security trumps the basic freedoms that define our nation at it’s best, something precious has been lost.

Many of the cases Friends of Justice has covered over the years involve irresponsible FBI agents.  Take Rodney Hayes, the rookie FBI agent who repeatedly lied to an Arkansas grand jury about Alvin Clay’s involvement in a real estate scam.  We are currently investigating a bizarre case in which an FBI agent mistakenly concluded that a black-run software company was nothing more than a fraudulent attempt to find work for the members of a Colorado Springs church.  When a grand jury refused to swallow these claims, the feds downgraded their claims and plowed ahead.  (More on that later.)

The horrible abuses of civil rights that characterized the J. Edgar Hoover years are gradually returning to America. We operate on the untenable assumption that every day, in every way our society is evolving toward perfection.  The truth is much more complex.  In some respects, we have made great strides; but in others, we are rapidly losing ground.  There is nothing inevitable about the emergence of a just society; we must work for justice, and the moment we stop working, we begin losing ground.  The Petraeus case suggests that, on the issue of privacy rights front, we have stopped working.

You Might Also Like :

Back to Featured Articles on Logo Paperblog

These articles might interest you :

  • So Where Are We with General Petraeus?

    What on earth is happening when an American who has been trusted as much as General Petraeus has his little love affair exposed (which doesn’t seem to have... Read more

    The 12 November 2012 by   Btchakir
  • All Out: Petraeus Steps Down

    The presidential election ended last week and the nation has finally turned its attention elsewhere. Unfortunately, surfacing at the end of last week, came the... Read more

    The 12 November 2012 by   Anthonyhymes
  • E-Mail And Arrogance Combine to Take Down Petraeus

    Gen. David Petraeus was perhaps the most high-profile U.S. military figure since Colin Powell and Norman Schwartzkopf became household words during the first... Read more

    The 11 November 2012 by   Rogershuler
  • The Prospect of Afghanistan by General Petraeus

    President Barack Obama announced that the United States would concentrate counterterrorism struggle on Afghanistan when he declared the end of combat missions i... Read more

    The 17 September 2010 by   Shahalexander
  • Unplug: A Case for Ditching Technology on Vacation

    Technology has essentially become an extension of our physical selves. And it’s no wonder – we rely on technology for many things. When all of those resources... Read more

    The 20 July 2015 by   Healthytravelblog
  • The Bible Of Secret Fast Food Menus

    In the begining…Harry Synder created In-N-Out Burger, and he said “Let there be burgers and fries and shakes and let it be good.”And the public said it was good. Read more

    The 23 July 2015 by   Christopher De Voss
  • THE MALDIVES: Idyll in the Indian Ocean, Guest Post by Ann Stalcup

    Maldive IslandsMy friend and fellow children’s book writer Ann Stalcup and her husband Ed love to travel. In June 2014 they went on a trip to the United Arab... Read more

    The 20 July 2015 by   Carolinearnoldtravel

Add a comment

Paperblog Hot Topics