Papuan New Guineans are Australoid and look identical to black Africans. And their IQ’s are the same as primitive Africans, so the similarities are more than skin deep.
Genetic distance means nothing because most genes are neutral. All it measures is chronological distance. Only SELECTED DNA determines race, and Australoid stayed in African climate and thus stayed Negroid.
What is tragic about this particular form of utter idiocy is that once again we see that Black nationalists (Black racists) and virulent White racists share the same views: that Australoids are really just Black people or Africans. To the Black nationalist morons, the Australoids are part of the glorious Black race, the cradle of all of humanity and the ultimate source of all of its greatness. To the hardcore White racists, Australoids are nothing but a bunch of niggers.
I have noticed over and over that racists and nationalists, even those who fiercely oppose each other, often agree in many ways. The reason they agree is because they are both insane. Virulent White racists are nuts, and Afrocentrists are also obviously insane.
So racists of all varieties, from Afrocentrists to KKK types, are really just the same sort of person (Type 1). Opposing them are folks who take a more non-racist or anti-racist point of view (Type 2). So on race, humans pretty much split into the nutcases (the racists) and the more or less sane people (those who do not place huge importance on race).
Most all ethnic nationalists are pretty much crazies, but it is stunning how the most ferocious nationalist enemies of all who would slit each other’s throats at a moment’s notice agree on so many things. So Zionists, Nazis, Arab nationalists, Persian nationalists, and Indian nationalists (Type 1) all more or less hate each other, but they have more commonalities than differences. Opposing them are people who are more and not particularly interested in nationalism – internationalists, multiculturalists, corporatists, the idle rich, cosmopolitans and other rootless types (Type 2). On nationalism, people are split between the nuts (various nationalists) and the saner folks (internationalists or those suspicious of ultranationalism.
One problem is that as Type 2 folks get more and more extreme, they start to resemble Type 1 folks. For instance, truly wild-eyed antiracists are about as insane as your average racist. And the multiculturalists and corporatists are often pushing an ideology as vile, wicked and senseless and the kookiest blood and soil types.
On genes, Australoids are clearly a vast split in the human race:
1. Africans
2. Austaloids
3. Everyone else!
Phenotypic race has always been hard to do with skulls, but obviously there are several phenotypical races by skulls”
1. Africans*
2. Caucasoids
3. Mongoloids (includes Amerindians)
4. Australoids (Tamils, Negritos, Senoi, Melanesians, Papuans and Aborigines)
*Older splits used to put Capoids into a separate group.
Papuans do not look like Black people. Actually, they look quite a bit different. I can show you Papuan phenotypes that look quite Caucasoid in fact.
Genetic distance is the only metric on which we can measure how different one race or ethnic group is from another. We measure on genes and only genes.
We can also do phenotypes, but the Australoid phenotype is not the same as the African phenotype. There are African phenotypes and Australoid phenotypes, and they plot into separate areas on skull charts with no overlap. On a skull chart, a given skull is either obviously Australoid or obviously Negroid, but in both groups or in an unclear group, and it is always clear which group one is in.
Going by genes, it makes much more sense to sense to say that Chinese and Europeans are Blacks than to say Australoids are Blacks. Australoids are in fact the least Black people on the planet.
Surface similarities are just that; they mean virtually nothing. In terms of selected DNA, Australoids have selected furthest away from Blacks. As it turns out, features that were selected for in Africa such as non-straight hair, wide noses and dark skin were all adaptive in tropical Australasia also, so these meaningless surface traits were retained.
Are you kidding? You look at an Aborigine and a Nigerian, and to you, they are “just a couple of niggers?” Aborigines do not look like Black people at all. In fact, they do not look like anyone.
IQ is irrelevant, and in fact, Australoid IQ (63) appears to be quite a bit lower than Negroid African IQ (72?). Are you trying to tell me that 9 IQ points difference is trivial?
