Why do I do it, then?A concern with veracity drives me.Throughout history enough people have told stories like this that either we have to lump our species together as a bunch of lying attention-grubbers, or there might be something to what they say.The academic and official responses have long been to state that such things can’t happen, so they don’t.When compared with how we come to know other things about life, we quickly realize that it involves experience.In cases where experience is anomalous we tend to dismiss it.We are great conformers.What if there really was a demon in the Snedeker house?Others have told similar tales.If there’s any reality to it, shouldn’t we know?
As a former academic, I always thought that if we really wish to learn the truth, no subject should be off-limits.That’s not the same thing as credulousness.We don’t have to believe everything overwrought people say, but the subject should be worth consideration.Of course, those who ghostwrote for the Warrens claim that they were given liberty to stretch the truth to make a better story.They also tend to claim that the basic elements of the story are true.When someone’s writing a book, there’s likely some hope of remuneration involved.And sometimes the truth isn’t quite flashy enough for major presses with the bottom line in sight.Still, the question of what really happened is left open.The internet is a place where credulity reigns.We can seek truth there only with great caution.Maybe that is the lesson to apply to books like this as well.Although In a Dark Place is scary, there was money at stake, and as the wise say, money changes everything.