Report from Sweden's semi-final shootout win over Russia
OVERALL GRADE
Collberg produced an overall grade of 69. His best work was produced in both the offensive, and neutral-zones.
15
WINS 46 WINS
EVENTS 67 EVENTS
GRADE 69 GRADE
PLAYER 15 PLAYER
EVEN-STRENGTH RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
Collberg produced an even-strength risk/reward rating of 1.10, and an ES ratio of 2 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. While these numbers are average for forwards, they are actually above average for wingers, who usually produce lower risk/reward ratings. The reason being is that wingers generally engage in fewer events than other position players.
*the average ES risk/reward among forwards is 1.10
*the average ES ratio among forwards is 1.87
15
POS 40 POS
NEG 20 NEG
RATIO 2.00 RATIO
15
POS/MIN 2.19 POS/MIN
NEG/MIN 1.10 NEG/MIN
15
EVENTS/ MIN 3.29 EVENTS/ MIN
RISK/REWARD 1.10 RISK/REWARD
15
OFFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
Collberg had an above-average offensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.55, and an o-zone ratio of 1.77 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He won his only o-zone puck-battle, and recovered 10 loose-pucks. He completed 3 of 6 pass-attempts, but only 2 of 5 attempts to beat opposing players 1on1 (deke). He was able to get 3 of his 5 attempted shots through to the net, and engaged in 1.97 offensive-zone events per-minute of play.
*the average offensive-zone risk/reward among forwards is 0.39
*the average offensive-zone ratio among forwards is 1.62
15
OZ POS 23 OZ POS
OZ NEG 13 OZ NEG
RATIO 1.77 RATIO
15
POS/MIN 1.26 POS/MIN
NEG/MIN 0.71 NEG/MIN
15
EVENTS/ MIN 1.97 EVENTS/ MIN
RISK/REWARD 0.55 RISK/REWARD
15
DEFENSIVE-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
Collberg produced a defensive-zone risk/reward rating of 0.16, and a d-zone ratio of 2 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. When looking at winger's numbers, ratios generally represent their play better than risk/reward ratings. similarly to what was mentioned earlier, this is because wingers engage in fewer defensive-zone events than other position players. Collberg recovered 3 loose-pucks, and completed each of his 3 defensive-zone pass-attempts. He failed with his only attempted deke, as well as his only attempt to dump the puck out of the defensive-zone.
*the average defensive-zone risk/reward among forwards is 0.38
*the average defensive-zone ratio among forwards is 1.95
15
DZ POS 6 DZ POS
DZ NEG 3 DZ NEG
RATIO 2.00 RATIO
15
POS/MIN 0.33 POS/MIN
NEG/MIN 0.16 NEG/MIN
15
EVENTS/ MIN 0.49 EVENTS/ MIN
RISK/REWARD 0.16 RISK/REWARD
15
NEUTRAL-ZONE RISK/REWARD RATING AND RATIO
Collberg produced an impressive neutral-zone risk/reward rating of 0.47, and a neutral-zone ratio of 2.75 successful plays for every 1 unsuccessful play. He was able to remove puck-possession from the opposition 4 times, and recovered 2 loose-pucks. He completed 2 of his 3 n-zone pass-attempts, and engaged in 1 neutral-zone event per-minute of even-strength ice-time.
*the average neutral-zone risk/reward among forwards is 0.30
*the average neutral-zone ratio among forwards is 2.14
15
NZ POS 11 NZ POS
NZ NEG 4 NZ NEG
RATIO 2.75 RATIO
15
POS/MIN 0.73 POS/MIN
NEG/MIN 0.27 NEG/MIN
15
EV/ MIN 1.00 EV/ MIN
RISK/REWARD 0.47 RISK/REWARD
15
EVEN-STRENGTH POSSESSION AND DEFENSIVE-RATINGS
These possession numbers reflect how successful Collberg was in each zone while in possession of the puck. The defensive numbers show how successful he was when attempting to remove or acquire puck-possession; and are also separated by zone.
Collberg's defensive numbers were far more impressive than his possession numbers during this particularly game.
15
O-ZONE POSS. 50.00 O-ZONE POSS.
N-ZONE POSS. 62.50 N-ZONE POSS.
D-ZONE POSS. 60.00 D-ZONE POSS.
15
O-ZONE DEF 75.00 O-ZONE DEF
N-ZONE DEF 85.71 N-ZONE DEF
D-ZONE DEF 75.00 D-ZONE DEF
15
This is simply a one-game scouting report. As such, it is only meant as a reflection of Collberg's play during this one game.