This is not the place to analyze America’s Dark Theologian in depth, but it is a place that would highly recommend the book.Cowan takes several aspects of King’s works and shows how they tie explicitly to traditional religious thinking and longing.I haven’t read nearly all the books Cowan cites here, nevertheless, the analysis he offers is compelling.Scholars of disciplines outside religious studies have tended to dismiss it as being moribund.Cowan shows that those who make a living in pop culture disagree.King makes no bones about the fact that he sees the application not only of religion, but also theology, as one of the driving forces for his fiction.We dismiss such observations at our peril.Think of you favorite King novel and ponder; is there religion there?
Clearly religion’s not always the cause, but Cowan gives a careful consideration to much of King’s oeuvre, and there’s no denying he’s onto something.As he points out, King is far more interested in the questions than in the answers.Those who know religious studies—theology, if you must—know that the same is true there.I’ve studied religion my entire intellectual life.One of the reasons students evaluated my teaching so positively, at least I hope, is that because I encouraged the questions and did not privilege the answers.In this field, answers are merely speculations.We only really fall into serious danger when we cease asking questions.Cowan does an excellent job of parsing out some various pieces that will make some kind of basis for a systematic theology of Stephen King’s thought-worlds.We would be wise, I believe, to pay attention.