Abortion Ban: The Third Election Candidate?
By Kelly Speechless
@KellySpeechless
New Candidate In Office: FIRST NAME: Abortion LAST NAME:
BAN’S. Abortion Ban’s are already making decisions as President before the
election? Is it, “If I win Presidential mock dress rehearsal day?”
Mr. Abortion Ban’s Rulings Are Higher than those in
the Supreme Court
Am I missing something? Is
someone named Abortion Ban another candidate for president? What does he look
like? Does his wife need a chemical peel and botox as badly as that guy hates
women does? What's his name Mitt, Schmidt, Tit, no its Flit! Flit Robby! OK so
this guy Abortion Ban is running with Flit as Vice President? Maybe
after you look below you might be able to explain. I hope someone allows
cosmetic enhancement to still be covered in order to scrape that Spackle off
of Flit's wife's face.
ROE V. WADE WAS A DRESS REHEARSAL? OR THE RULING A
VERY LATE APRIL FOOLS JOKE? WHY ARE "BAN'S," MORE POWERFUL THAN THE
SUPREME COURT?
New Candidate In Office: FIRST NAME: Abortion LAST NAME:
BAN’S. Abortion Ban’s are already making decisions as President before the
election? Is it, “If I win Presidential mock dress rehearsal day?”
When Santa and roe v. Wade were
still real....
On January 22, 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court handed
down its landmark decision, Roe v. Wade, recognizing the constitutional
right to privacy and a woman’s right to choose abortion.
Many of us don’t
recall the deadly days before Roe when abortions were illegal, and
"choice" for too many women meant a dangerous back-alley procedure.
In fact, in 1965 — before Roe — nearly one-fifth of all maternal
deaths in the United States were due to illegal, unsafe abortions.
Decades later, a woman’s constitutional right to
choose still isn’t safe, and Roe is in serious jeopardy. In 2005,
Congress confirmed the appointment of two new anti-choice Supreme Court
justices — Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. —
both of whom had been nominated by President George W. Bush. As a result, the
court is closer than ever to overturning Roe.
justice john g. Roberts jr. and justice samuel a. alito jr. need to calm down because there nomination of-anti-choice supreme court justices would hold power if the supreme court could make decisions. the ban's already did the damage! so what is the point of beating the shit out of roe.
Adoption
Ban’s Can Apparently OVERRIDE and Make
Decisions: Over the President, Supreme Court, Roe v. Wade, and Medical
Professionals.
So basically here is the run down of bull shit.
- Roe V. Wade Is Still the Law
- BUT BANS CAN GO AROUND
LAWS? Apparently.
- Unless someone
gets clearance for a abortion ban.-whatever the fuck
that means.
- Since this leaves out doctors in the mix
"ban," enthusiasts step in.
- Politicians feel the ban allows them to
make medical decisions.
- Even though the ban's initial purpose
was to criminalize abortion and now its strong enough to do much
more?
- Since the doctors are MIA, Politicians
decided the ban-applies in the 2nd trimester -because it is the safest
time to undergo an abortion?
- The next goals of these Abortion Ban
Groupies is to spread these bans around like new Starbucks locations.
- The death of Roe is the goal and reason
for spreading the ban’s?
- ban's
are to spread among states and get strong enough to fuck over
Roe.
- Didn't they already fuck over Roe if
they are already doing these things?
The JR. CHEESEBURGER guys of anti-choice will be doing surgery this fall...
In
2007, in a 5–4 decision, the court upheld the federal abortion ban passed by
Congress and signed by President Bush in 2003. Although Roe v. Wade is
still the law of the land, the ban criminalizes abortion procedures in the
second trimester of pregnancy that doctors say are often the safest and best to
protect women's health. Thus, the ruling allows politicians to make medical
decisions that should be made by women and their doctors. Anti-choice
legislators are attempting to launch a wave of state
abortion bans, in the hope that the new anti-choice court will
overturn Roe, leaving a woman’s right to choose safe and legal abortion in
the hands of 50 different state legislatures.
Planned Parenthood is fighting in Washington and the
states to make sure the right to choose a safe and legal abortion remains
secure for women, regardless of where they live.
In
2007, in a 5–4 decision, the court upheld the federal abortion ban passed by
Congress and signed by President Bush in 2003. AlthoughRoe v. Wade is
still the law of the land, the ban criminalizes abortion procedures in the
second trimester of pregnancy that doctors say are often the safest and best to
protect women's health. Thus, the ruling allows politicians to make medical
decisions that should be made by women and their doctors. Anti-choice
legislators are attempting to launch a wave of state
abortion bans, in the hope that the new anti-choice court will
overturn Roe, leaving a woman’s right to choose safe and legal abortion in
the hands of 50 different state legislatures.
Planned Parenthood is fighting in Washington and the
states to make sure the right to choose a safe and legal abortion remains
secure for women, regardless of where they live.
-opinion based + Planned parenthood activism website source.