Beatrix writes:
Well, perhaps it’s because you said ‘female rule’ instead of what you actually meant? Why not call it an Oppressive Matriarchy or Oppressive Female Rule if that’s what you mean? Obviously a general term like ‘female rule’ isn’t the best descriptive. How about Hiscrimination? Says what it means.
The way I see it is that Female Rule can’t be anything other than oppressive, and I suppose the same can be said of Male Rule. Even if the President was a woman and even if the majority of Congress was female, if they were real women instead of feminists and were not privileging women and abusing and oppressing men, I would not call it Female Rule. I am not sure what you would call it, maybe Females in Power.
Female Rule means they are ruling us, they are lording it over us. Male Rule means men are ruling women, they are lording it over women. Neither sex should rule the other sex or all of society and neither sex should privilege their own and abusing and oppressing me.
Women in Power is no problem. I gave you a list of many great female leaders of nations who did not oppress men one bit. Maybe Female Rule should mean Feminist Political Power.
There is a bit of an issue though because once women really seize a lot of political power, more than just a head of state, they usually start doing a lot of things that are really detrimental to men. I do not know why that is. I just like you almost can’t have a lot of women in power without them trying to turn the tables on us and fuck us over. If you can show me some places were women have a lot of political power and are not abusing men, I would like to look at that.