Horatio hits the nail on the head here:
I think the reason we have so many against White pride etc is BECAUSE we are individualistic. It takes some audacious individuality for a population to have members who support it becoming a minority AND having such a view tolerated as just another political point of view.
I think this kind of proves my point. We’re so rebellious, we even tolerate what essentially is ethnic treason as an idea. I couldn’t imagine China being a country OK with Chinese running around saying that China needs to look more like Mauritius.
We don’t even view ourselves as “a people” anymore, and the thought that we could act like the “savages” and have a group identity seems an anathema to them.
Somehow this got off the ground, and it got off the ground because people were able to break away from the previous conformity to create a new one.
Exactly. Someone finally figures it out and gets it! I have been thinking along these lines myself for quite some time now, but I never put it all together the way this fellow did. If you cannot figure this post out, read it over and over again until you do. Horatio gets it. Everyone else must also.
The problem here is that one of the greatest strengths of the West – anticonformist individualism -not the same thing as laissez faire capitalist individualism – is also used by Whites to paradoxically destroy not only their own people but also their own majority-ethnic White lands themselves. Our own greatness is turned against us by ourselves! The problem here is that almost all White priders continue to promote laissez-faire radical individualism. This philosophy is not only against the historical principles of egalitarianism and justice that Whites also solely promote but is also the principal philosophy behind the dismantling of White people and White countries themselves.
White priders say they want to save White people and White countries. Fine. They have a right to their own views. In particular, historical White values such as freedom of speech for unpopular opinions grants them that right. But White priders will never get anywhere until they abandon radical individualism, the cancer that eats at the heart of their very own movement. They must instead adopt at least a modicum of communalism and collectivism necessary for an ethnic nationalist movement to survive.
White priders just don’t get it. They can’t see the forest for the trees. As such, they are hoisted on their own petard. It is hard to feel sorry for a suidical movement, and that is what the White prider movement is at the end of the day. The saddest thing is that they will never see this.