different approaches...
a haredi news site, when reporting about this week's announcement by Machon Hamikdash, The Temple Institute, that they have begun a project to raise a para aduma in Eretz Yisrael, the report describes it as a "crazy initiative" "by the delusional people of Har Habayit".
When I saw that I was a bit shocked. They are definitely not the first to try to raise a para aduma, so why would they be called delusional and the project be called crazy?
Then I realized that I could just look back and find how they themselves reported the recent para aduma candidate in the United States, in a town outside of Lakewood. I looked back and found the article.
Then they used descriptions such as "historic", describing the many rabbinic visits for inspections, while referencing the Rambam about para aduma implying it is a sign of the coming of Mashiach...
What's the difference?
------------------------------------------------------
Reach thousands of readers with your ad by advertising on Life in Israel
------------------------------------------------------