We've all seen for America's top CEOs. The stunning (and growing) salaries beg the question - can one person be worth such an enormous amount of money?
Think about the best leaders you know. What traits do they embody? It's clear that certain skill sets like organization and creativity often lead to better outcomes for a business. But leadership assessments can only provide so much information. Until now there's been no concrete way to equate a person's leadership skills to the actual
In The Return on Leadership: A Three Step Plan to Navigate Change and Unlock Hidden Growth
Here are two examples using Brouwer's scale:
- A savant savant-like Jeff Bezos at the helm resulted in a RoL Ratio of 24,253 in 2016 for Amazon.
- A directionless General Electric paid CEO Jeffrey Immelt $21.3 million only to see its market cap to fall $34 billion. As a result, GE's RoL Ratio was only 1,596 in that same year.
Amazon and GE may be extreme outliers at either end of the RoL range - most companies fall within a much more narrow margin. (For an assessment of the top 20 public companies by market capitalization visit Brouwer's site here.) One of the strengths of this metric is that it allows for a direct comparison of the RoL Ratio for companies within a specific industry, or at different stages of their corporate maturity. For public companies that might represent an investment opportunity, it could provide a new metric to consider.
The RoL Ratio is a good start to determine how leadership affects corporate performance and Brouwer's book is an interesting read. More importantly, it could provide some insight into the question of whether or not America's CEO's deserve the pay they receive. The Return on Leadership is definitely worth a read for those with strong opinions on this topic.