Malla: Well, I did some research on this and it seems the Mizrahi had a more realistic opinion about Arabs and non Whites in general, while the Ashkenazim (and maybe Sephardics), especially during the early days of Israel, had a more idealistic opinion of the Third World. But the Mizrahi themselves are non-Whites. If Arabs and non-Whites then so are Mizrahis because Mizrahis are just Arabs. Besides, many Ashkenazis came with socialistic ideas of kibbutz farming and hippieness, while the Mizrahi were more realistic.
Check this interesting video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f80NnYflDU8
Check out the Ashkenazi/Mizrahi couple at 6:52. So it seems more Mizrahi (Middle Eastern Jews) are more right wing and support predatory violent behavior towards Arabs and Palestinians, while the Ashkenazis (Euro Jews) vote more left and are friendlier to Arabs (idealistic mindset). I do not know how the Sephardics and Ethiopians Jews vote.
Besides, Israel has a massive poverty rate, one of the highest in OECD countries. No wonder they get pissed by migrants from Africa taking way their jobs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SSd0rgTc1E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPuQwFX2J2A
But Israel has an overall high standard of living. Arabs in Israel, in spite of whatever racism they face, have a higher standard of living and social freedoms than most other Arab countries. Only Tunisia and Christian-dominated Lebanon come close in social freedom, and the Gulf states are the only ones who have more income among Arabs.
This is similar to the case in Rhodesia and South Africa where the Blacks had a higher standard of living than Blacks in the rest of the African continent. Or Singapore, where the Indians and Malays have a higher standard of living than Malaysia and definitely (much, much, much) higher standard of living than India thanks to the huge Chinese population. Singapore’s quality of life is comparable to other Chinese majority developed places like Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. One may ask that if Anglo-Celts and other Northern Euros never came to Australia would such an Australia (Australia full of only aborigines) be so developed as it is today or it would be more like Papua New Guinea.
It’s pretty bad to compare the surrounding Arabs with New Guineans and Aborigines. The whole Arab World is built up to Hell. They’re all modern countries over there. I have seen photos of Libya before the war and it looks like Miami. I saw a recent photo of Casablanca and it looked like LA. I have seen photos of the rest of the region, even war-torn Syria and Iraq, and they just look like regular modern countries. There’s not a lot of difference between in the ordinary street scene between Amman, Beirut, Damascus or even Cairo and Tel Aviv. It all looks the same, like any modern built country.
There is none of the horrible poverty you see in India, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Latin America or Black Africa.
Arabs will not tolerate that sort of abject shantytown type poverty. They are basically socialist people who don’t care about money too much and believe that everyone should be well taken care of. Social safety nets are ordinary things in every Arab country. There’s no debate about this stuff. They are not individualists. They are collectivists. And they don’t think rich people are better than poor people. They are not that greedy, and they have a sort of “We are all part of one village” mindset wherever they live.
Semi-feudalism came late to the Arab World via the Ottomans, and it never worked well. There were landed gentry and fellahin, or peasants. Nasser was the man who confiscated the land from the land barons. If you went around the whole Arab World back then, even in say Yemen, there would be a portrait of Nasser on every wall. Now in Western or Latin American culture, doing that is called Communism and everyone hates it. But the Arabs love this sort of thing.
Baath nationalist parties came in in Syria and Iraq around 1960, a socialist state arose in Libya in 1969, and a revolutionary socialist state was birthed in Algeria in 1964. Land was confiscated from feudal latifundistists in all of these place and distributed to the peasants. The governments were all officially socialist, secularization was enforced even at gunpoint if it took that, huge safety nets were set up, and the state even got involved in quite a few of the larger industries and became a major employer. All of this was wildly popular all over the region.
US style radical individualism and Libertarian free market capitalism is totally anathema to all of those societies. For one thing, it goes against Islam, as Islam is a pretty socialist religion. In feudal times, large Arab landowners enlisted the help of the local imams in interpreting parts of the Koran where it said, “Some are rich, and some are poor, and that’s all just fine” or something to that effect, but it never worked well, and it ended up turning the local imams into hated figures like the priests of Catholic Church in the West and Latin America who always sided with the rich against the people.
So this whole idea that the Israeli Arabs have it good for having some extra money falls flat on Arab ears and even on Arab Israeli ears. Standard of living is not number one of the list of the most important things in life.
If the Arabs are all so jealous of Israel, why are the non-oil Arabs are not jealous of the oil Arabs? Typical Jews to reduce everything down to money. Arabs don’t care that much about money. They don’t revolve their whole lives around money or sit around hating Jews for having my skyscrapers than they do. That’s not important to your average Arab.
I have never in my life heard one Arab tell me they were jealous of Israel.
In Palestine, a bunch of White European racist fascists invaded the region, started wars with everyone around them, and, being high IQ, produced a developed economy. So what? These jerks get brownie points because they are rich? I’m supposed to love them because they’re rich and hate those Arabs because they’re poor?
The commenter is an Indian, that’s why he thinks that way. We are socialists here, we don’t think like this. Actually I think the more money someone, has the worse of a person he tends to be, but that’s just me.
All of these arguments were used by the South African assholes who practiced a very similar White settler-colonial project far after this stuff went out of style.
Arabs in Israel are not happy people at all. They’re pretty angry, and they have no loyalty to the state at all. The Jewish fascists say the Arabs are traitors, and they are actually correct on that score. Indeed they have no loyalty to the state and do not even see themselves as Israelis.
And yes, they are treated institutionally as second class citizens exactly how the Blacks were under apartheid. The similarities between Israel and apartheid South Africa are striking. It’s notable that Israel was long one of South Africa’s strongest allies, and towards the end, it was one of their only allies.
Were those Blacks happier on their South African Nigger Plantation because they had a higher standard of living? They were not, but this was the argument that was used to show that they were happy Negroes toiling away cheerfully in the sun for their beloved White slavemasters. Similarly, South Africa moved into the neighborhood and in a matter of time, like Israel it was soon embroiled in wars with most if not all of its neighbors. Similarly, South Africa, like Israel, had zero friends in the region.
Blacks in South Africa and Arabs in Israel don’t want money and stuff. White Gentiles and Jews only care about money, and they don’t care about humans, so they think everyone else feels that way too. But they don’t. People want to be free, even if being free means not having as much stuff. Stuff doesn’t make people happy. You can keep giving your slave the latest gadgetry in his slave quarters, but he’s still not a free man.
Same with South Africa. Hey look, these White European racist fascists came in here and built up the region and made a big economy because they have higher IQ’s! So what. I am supposed to like them more because they are rich and hate those Africans because they are poor? I realize this is Indian thinking, but we socialists do not think that way.
Arabs have more political rights in all of the Arab World. In the Arab World, they are not systematically discriminated against due to their religion or ethnicity.
I would argue that those Arabs in Israel do not want all of those social freedoms. Freedom to do what?
And what social freedoms do they have there that they do not have in the rest of the region? How are Arab Israeli Christians social freedoms better than those of Arab Christians in Lebanon or Syria? Someone needs to clue me.