On Sunday, I posted some comments on Simcha Jacobovici and Barrie Wilson's forthcoming book and documentary, Jacobovici and Wilson's "Lost Gospel". It led to a very interesting comments thread in which the possibility came up that their "lost gospel" might in fact be a section from Pseudo-Zachariah Rhetor featuring a Syriac text of Joseph and Aseneth as well as the correspondence that prefaces it. In response to this, Richard Bauckham has sent the following comments, which I am here promoting to a post of its own. I have also made this available as a PDF here.
--
The Bride of God or the Lost Gospel of Joseph and Asyath
Richard Bauckham
I think there can be no doubt that this
‘lost Gospel’ is a section of The
Chronicle of Pseudo-Zachariah Rhetor. The relevant section is Book I chs. 4-6,
where chapter 6 is ‘The History of Joseph the Just and Asyath his wife,’ while
chapters 4-5 are two letters that introduce it. The recent English translation
of Pseudo-Zacharias (2011) does not include books I-II, mainly because these
are not ecclesiastical history and consist mainly of material found also
elsewhere. The editors do note that others are working on these books.
I do not read Syriac, and so, in the
absence of an English translation, I have consulted the Latin translation by E.
W. Brooks (CSCO 3/5, 1924). In the first of the two letters the unnamed writer
says that he found in a library a work in Greek called ‘the book of Asyath.’ He
says he read only its ‘historia’ (the Greek word apparently used in the Syriac
text) and did not understand its ‘theōria’ (Greek again). Since the Greek language is difficult and alien for
him, he asks his learned correspondent, a certain Moses ‘Ingilae,’ to translate
it into Syriac for him, and to explain both its ‘historia’ as a whole and
something of its ‘theōria’. Moses replies, saying that he has read the ‘historia’ of the book
and, if I’m understanding the text correctly, that the ‘theōria’ contained in it is (‘to put it briefly’)
the truth that our God our Lord the Word became incarnate by the will of the
Father and became human and was joined to a soul with its perfect senses ….
And there the text
breaks off without finishing the sentence. You can imagine what fun Jacobovici
and Wilson will have with that suspiciously lost ending.
The words historia and theōria are obviously here used in the way they were in
the Alexandrian tradition of biblical exegesis, where every Old Testament
narrative (historia)
is expected to have a corresponding Christian
allegorical meaning (theōria). Since Joseph
and Asenath tells a story about Old Testament characters, it was natural
for Moses and his correspondent to suppose it must have an allegorical meaning,
which to them would be much more interesting than the literal reading. I
suspect that Moses took Asenath (or Asyath, as she is called) to represent the
church, the bride of Christ, and Joseph to represent the incarnate Christ,
while his heavenly alter ego, the
archangel, is the pre-existent Logos. (Moreover, I think he may have been
right. I strongly suspect that Joseph and
Asenath is not a Jewish work, at least not in the form we have it, but a
Christian work with allegorical meaning. But this is hardly relevant to the
present argument.)
Jacobovici and Wilson
have evidently supposed that the talk of historia and theōria in the two letters means that the story is a
cover for a coded meaning, which is the true history of Jesus. They have missed
the fact that Moses and his correspondent are speaking merely about the usual
sort of allegorical exegesis that in the Alexandrian school was applied to any
such narrative.
There seems to be
nothing special about the Syriac version of Joseph
and Asenath in Pseudo-Zacharias, apart from the fact that Asenath is called
Asyath. But it’s not too difficult to see roughly how Jacobovoci and Wilson are
interpreting it. Joseph, I guess, is a cypher for Jesus, a thoroughly human
figure who nevertheless has a kind of heavenly counterpart in the chief
archangel. In the story Asenath’s name is changed to ‘City of Refuge,’ within
whose walls many nations are going to gather. Since ‘Magdalene’ derives from migdal, tower, this change of name
refers to Jesus giving his wife Mary the new name Magdalene, to symbolize the
role she is to have in the Christian movement. Note that the blurb for the book
refers to ‘the towering presence of Mary Magdalene’! In the story, Joseph and
Asenath have two children: Ephraim and Manasseh. That Mary Magdalene is the
‘bride of God’ reflects the last section of Asenath’s psalm (21:21). I expect
the strong political dimension in the description of Jacobovici and Wilson’s
book refers to some kind of reading of chapters 23-29 of Joseph and Asenath. None of this sounds to me any more far-fetched
than Barbara Thiering’s so-called pesher reading of the Dead Sea Scrolls.
Since Jacobovici and
Wilson say that the lost gospel has 29 chapters, they must be well aware that
the Syriac work in Pseudo-Zacharias is the well-known Greek Joseph and Asenath. What they find
special in Pseudo-Zacharias must be the two letters with their cryptic
suggestion of a hidden meaning that has something to do with the incarnation of
the Logos.
--