It was a great moment for India – 2nd April 2011 – as millions watched, the World Cup final ran into confusion before the first ball was bowled. The coin had to be tossed twice ! after the match referee Jeff Crowe said he had not heard Sri Lanka captain Kumar Sangakkara's call the first time !!. The Wankhede Stadium was not yet filled to its 33,000 capacity, and the noise was yet to reach its peak. Commentator Ravi Shastri, who was hosting the toss, said it had fallen heads the first time. When MS Dhoni threw up the coin again, Sangakkara called 'heads' and the coin fell Sri Lanka's way.
Kumar Sangakkara (captain of that World Cup side), Aravinda de Silva (chief selector), and opening batsman Upul Tharanga were all summoned to appear before a special investigation unit set up by Sri Lanka's sports ministry. They were each questioned for hours. Mahela Jayawardene, who scored a hundred in that game, was also due for questioning, but the investigation was halted before he appeared before the unit, is the hot news now !! 2nd April 2011 turned another cherished day as much as 25th June 1983 in the annals of Indian Cricket. MS Dhoni created history leading the team from the front, with a strong performance with the bat and astutely marshalling his resources. His leadership qualities assume greater significance for he backs his men strongly, leads from the front, talks to people, does not spew emotions on the field and above all is willing to accept the responsibility of all his actions and take the blame.A man made of strong mind and steely resolve.As he walked to the podium he said : -"I took a quite few decisions tonight, if we hadn't won I would have been asked quite a few questions: Why no Ashwin, Why sreesanth. Why no Yuvraj, Why did I bat ahead?! That pushed me and motivated to do well. The pressure had got to me in the previous games. In this game, I wanted to bat up the order and Gary backed me and by the senior players. I had a point to prove to myself. Virat and Gautam batted brillantly; lots of singles. Then with the help of bit of dew , we put pressure on the spinners. I would have liked Gautam to go on and get that big hundred."
The former sports minister had raised doubts about four changes in team selection in the final. The quizzing of players drew public ire and the former sports minister was subjected to criticism for raising the issue after nine years of the event. Aluthgamage claimed that he believed that players were not involved but couldn't prove how could a match be fixed without involvement of the participants. Moving away, a T20 match played near Chandigarh but streamed online as a game in Sri Lanka has caught the attention of BCCI's Anti-Corruption Unit, the Punjab Police and the island country's cricket board, which has rejected any involvement and vowed to take legal action.The 'Indian Express' reported on Friday that the game played on 29 June took place in Sawara village, 16 km from Chandigarh, but was streamed as a 'Uva T20 League' match in Sri Lanka's Badulla city, home of the Uva Province Cricket Association.While Punjab Police officials said an investigation is currently on to ascertain if a betting syndicate was involved, the BCCI asserted that it is keeping an eye, but only to the extent of getting details of those involved. The SLC, on the other hand, denied having any knowledge of the match ever being planned in Sri Lanka. Whether it involved betting or not, whether there is some scam or not – how can a Cricket match be allowed to be played during Covid 19 lockdown. With regards – S. Sampathkumar 3.7.2020.