I detailed a colleague to be our Auto-enrolment Guru. Here's his latest analysis.
“Various Trade reports in the financial press, coupled
with murmurings and press releases from corporate and stakeholder pension
providers, suggest the future for Auto-enrolment is far from rosy.
The Peoples Pension scheme has set their fee at 0.5% AMC for funds under management, Now Pensions is 0.3% Plus £18 pa per member admin charge and NEST is 0.3% plus 1.8% admin fee on all funds
Industry Talk suggests most pension providers saddled with firms forced to enrol with less than ten members will be totally uneconomic to take under their wing and many are not prepared to state that their schemes will meet pension regulator approval and planning to reject access to schemes with 50 members or less. They calculate based on National Earnings of 21,000pa and assuming late staging date pension premiums totally 8%, that small size firms of ten people will produce £16,800 of pension premiums per annum.
That equates to the Peoples Pension charging £84.00 per annum per firm, Now Pensions = £230.40 and NEST £352.80
Although the funds under management will rise, providers are quick to point out that the “Fraud Levy” of £230 will be applied to providers, not employer firms, and the “Pension Regulator “ is yet to decide what charge to levy on the industry for its increased role in policing the legislation and issuing Certification. It seems the overheads will exceed the benefits and pension providers are not now prepared to offer any guarantee that their scheme will comply with the requirements of the regulator and aim to suspend auto-enrolment in 2016. “ Maybe our research is wrong.....?