The Fugitive
In the Name of the Father
The Piano
The Remains of the Day
Schindler’s List (winner)
What’s Missing
1993 is a great year for film, and while I don’t have serious objections to the nominations, there are some places where I’d want to go. Really, though, based on the sort of movies that Oscar typically nominates, the five nominees are all good and well-made movies. Still, The Age of Innocence and Philadelphia are also the kinds of movies that warrant some Oscar love and I’m a little surprised they’re not here. I feel like Searching for Bobby Fischer was a film that was sadly ignored and is underknown. Bigger stretches for Oscar would include films like True Romance, Tombstone, and even Jurassic Park, which may have deserved some attention. Cronos, My Neighbor Totoro, Groundhog Day, Dave, and Addams Family Values are serious longshots, and while I love all of these movies, I can’t say that I’d seriously put any of them up for Best Picture consideration. I’d say the same for The Sandlot, but I might get some pushback on that. If I could add a single movie, my choice would be Three Colors: Blue, my favorite of the trilogy.
Weeding through the Nominees
5. This is surprisingly difficult because I don’t really want to put any of these movies in fifth place. I have a certain amount of respect for all of them. Of them, In the Name of the Father is a film that, in my review I said was merely good with some great performances. I think I stand by that. It’s a pretty straightforward case of wrongful imprisonment with a lot of politics behind it. But aside from some great performances, the film itself isn’t really that different from what you expect it to be. It’s good, but I’d rather have Three Colors: Blue here.
4. I think I could probably say the same thing about The Piano. This is a fascinating story, but it fails for me on one of the levels it desperately wants to succeed in: I don’t buy the romance at all. That’s a problem in a movie that bills itself at least in part as a romance. Anna Paquin is by far the best part of the film and she was rewarded at the Oscars. I don’t really hate that it was nominated, but it’s not a movie I plan on watching again any time soon. I may be giving it short shrift, but again, I think it’s good with great performances.
3. The Remains of the Day, aside from The Great British Baking Show, might well be the absolutely most British thing in existence, and I appreciate it on that level. It’s again a film that trades on monster performances from its stars, in this case those stars being some of the most highly acclaimed actors of their generation. It’s a hard film not to appreciate, but I did find it a hard film to enjoy. I get the nomination and I don’t entirely disagree with it, but it would have to be a weaker year for me to want to see it win.
My Choices
2. I freely admit that putting The Fugitive as a possible winner is something of a cheat for me. I happen to really like this movie a lot because it gets just about everything right. It’s smart, it gives us smart characters in just about every aspect of the film. We root for the fugitive himself, but we also end up rooting for the people who are chasing him. This comes from a dynamite screenplay and a lot of really good roles filled by really good people. The action is good, and the plot is great as well. It would never win, but I love that it was nominated, and I wouldn’t complain had it won.
1. But Schindler’s List is what it is. It was almost guaranteed to win, and I don’t entirely object to it. I actually prefer The Fugitive as something to watch, but I don’t have a problem suggesting that Schindler’s List is an objectively great film in many respects. Spielberg does go for the emotional digs here and there (he can’t help himself), but he doesn’t overwhelm with them. And, for what it’s worth, it’s important. It is a film that will be discussed for about as long as film (or history) gets talked about. It was going to win the minute the nominations were announced and, well, it did.
Final Analysis