Killer Arguments Against LVT, Not (374)

Posted on the 29 October 2015 by Markwadsworth @Mark_Wadsworth
Today both @K_Niemietz & @MrRBourne mentioned the state's historic absence. It was never so: https://t.co/9Tzgbgiqth pic.twitter.com/hO7zLK0eP9— Land & Liberty (@Land_Liberty) October 29, 2015

BenJamin's favorite Faux Lib responded:
@Land_Liberty @MrRBourne Oh, your theory that if the state dished out free land, call center workers would become happy subsistence farmers.— Kristian Niemietz (@K_Niemietz) October 29, 2015

Your truly responded:
@K_Niemietz @Land_Liberty Instead of being call center workers struggling to pay the rent, their net disposable income after housing costs would go up 50%!- Mark Wadsworth (@Mark_Wadsworth) October 29, 2015

See also: "If we had LVT, smallholders and subsistence farmers would be wiped out." If the Homeys make two equal and opposite arguments, we know that at least one of them must be incorrect and usually both.