Democrat Senator Wants Court to Allow Homosexual Father to Marry His Son

Now that the floodgate of homosexual marriage is opened, every grotesquerie is emerging.

Already, a Montana man wants legalization of polygamy, while the UK’s Green Party has declared its support for polygamy.

The latest move: Allowing homosexual men to “marry” their adopted “sons”.

Fr. Mark Hodges reports for LifeSiteNews, Nov. 5, 2015, that Nino Esposito and Roland Bosee, Jr. are a homosexual couple. Three years ago, Esposito adopted Bosee as his legal son for purely financial reasons — to reduce the Pennsylvania inheritance tax payable upon the death of one of the men from 15% (for unrelated third parties) to 4% (between parent and child). Now that homosexual marriage is legal in Pennsylvania, they want the court to dissolve the legal adoption so as to marry each other.

Note: Esposito, who is 78, adopted Bosee, 68, in 2012. They have been “together” since 1970. (Fox32)

In upending the usage of words such as “son” and “marriage” and “male” and “female,” homosexuals and the Left are making a mockery of the English language, rendering words meaningless.

But Judge Lawrence J. O’Toole, of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, told the men that state law doesn’t give him the power to dissolve a legal adoption, unless there was fraud involved.

So Pennsylvania senator Bob Casey, a Democrat, is asking the Obama administration to strongarm the judge. Casey wrote a letter asking U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch and the Obama White House to “issue guidance for courts across the country so that gay couples who have previously entered into adoptions can annul them in order to receive marriage licenses.”

Casey even provided Obama with the how-to, pointing to a precedent when a Bucks County judge had annulled a homosexual couple’s adoption.

Casey suggests to the Obama administration that it “may have to be creative” because adoption law is a state, not federal, matter. The attorney general may file a “statement of interest” or a “friend of the court” brief. Either action would pressure judges by pointing out alleged constitutional protections at stake if homosexuals are not allowed to dissolve adoptions.

Casey is being hailed by the usual suspects. Gay activists showered praise on him. LGBTQ lawyer Helen Casale enthuse, “I love Senator Casey for taking a position!” Legal director of ACLU Pennsylvania Witold Walczak said, “The ACLU is hopeful that the Superior Court will apply established legal principles to allow annulment of adoptions by same-sex couples who that [sic] they can finally partake of their constitutional right to marry.”

Bosee’s and Esposito’s case is on appeal before Pennsylvania’s Superior Court.

It should come as no surprise that Senator Bob Casey is “gay”. He came out in 2013 when he publicly supported same-sex marriage, calling it “the right thing to do”.