And before you listen to the interview, I'll quote from a Boiling Frogs Post review of Secker's book:
Dead men tell no tales. Muslim suicide bombers––even less. Acceptance of the evidence brought against them is essentially the equivalent of simply reading the headlines instead of the article; key words and phrases opposed to the fine print.The major accusation in Secker's argument seems to be that the four men, who were alleged to have made bombs to perform a suicide attack on Central London on July 7th 2005, were dispatched (assassinated elsewhere) after a trial run in London one week before The 7/7 Event happened. Their bodies of the 'four suicide bombers' were not numbered among the dead, after all of the other bodies have been logged.
Security camera footage. Eye witnesses. Bomb-making supplies. Phone calls from Pakistan. A radical bookshop. Martyrdom videos!
The words themselves practically bleed with guilt and culpability.
And the list goes on.
The traditional stratagem of media manipulation, saddled with the slow crawl of admissible evidence and information and the exhaustive, apathetic influence that it produces––a strong, if not vital crux of the book––is seemingly all that the sellers of the “official” story of 7/7 wish to offer to the open market. Fortunately for us, Secker isn’t buying. [source BFP]
In this interview, Secker doesn't discuss the White Widow (!) '7/7 suicide bomber' Germaine Lindsay's wife Samantha Lewthwaite, recently implicated by Interpol w.r.t. the Westgate Mall terror attack in Nairobi. But he does mention Q, an alleged Al Qaeda 'facilitator' who may have had contact with and sent for training all the usual suspects in 7/7.
Here's the CORBETT REPORT AUDIO INTERVIEW WITH TOM SECKER.