A bench of Justices V Gopala Gowda and C Nagappan had on April 1 'admitted' Singh's appeal, stayed the summons and all proceedings initiated by the trial court against the ex-PM and other accused. The words 'admit' and 'grant of leave' on special leave petitions have special significance in Supreme Court procedures. Whenever the court finds that a substantial question of law has been raised by a petitioner requiring detailed hearing, which could span days together, it grants leave or 'admits' the petitions to be heard later without assigning a date. While admitting special leave petitions of Singh and others, the bench said, "Since certain important substantial questions of law as well as the constitutional validity of Section 13(1)(d)(iii) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are raised in the instant petitions, we are of the view that these matters require examination." Like in all such instances, the judges did not give any date for listing of these petitions. The registry also did not indicate any likely date for listing of the appeals. Going by the queue system for hearing of admitted appeals, the petition filed by Singh and others summoned as accused in the case related to alleged irregular allotment of Talabira-II coal block could take five years to get listed for hearing. At present, the SC is hearing criminal petitions 'admitted' by various benches in 2009-10 and seldom hears out of turn appeals which are admitted thereafter. Given the fast-tracking of pending appeals undertaken by the registry, pursued seriously by Chief Justice H L Dattu, the long queue of cases awaiting hearing could be judicially dealt with in 3-4 years. This means, Singh's appeal may be heard only in 2018. Till then, as per the apex court's April 1 order, the proceedings before the trial court against Singh and other accused will remain stayed. While this will not put an end to the case against the former PM, the summons against him will remain frozen, insulating him from the risk of any legal trouble. Even in the high profile case Nirbhaya case, the SC has said it will not hear the appeals against death sentences to the accused out of turn. "There are 23 death reference cases pending in the Supreme Court which are older than Nirbhaya case. We go in the chronological order of the cases reaching the SC. We are now hearing appeals against death penalty cases which were filed in 2012 and 2013. Nirbhaya case appeal was filed in SC in 2014. So it will await its turn," CJI H L Dattu had said. The delay will also suit CBI which unsuccessfully argued for closure of the case against Singh and will be required, whenever SC hears the appeal, to make the difficult choice between sticking to its original stand or arguing for sustaining the summoning order. Mr Singh, in his 184-page petition in the SC, has raised 19 substantial questions of law. In our school days, there was this short story in English lesson ~ one by the eminent Russian –Leo Tolstoy, first published in 1872, titled - "God Sees the Truth, But Waits" – a story of a man sent to prison for a murder he didn't commit ~ the brilliant narrative took the form of a parable of forgiveness. It was the short story of Ivan Dmitrich Aksionov, a merchant living in a town inRussia,Vladimir.
With regards – S. Sampathkumar
9th Apr 2015.