Ben Carson Panders to NRA-Sounds Retarded

Posted on the 30 April 2015 by Mikeb302000
Sooo...GOP hopeful, Dr. Ben Carson got hisself edumacated by the NRA on guns.  Take it away Uncle Ben:
Actually, as I’ve stated, that was expressed with the wrong emphasis. Because I don’t have any problem with any American having any weapon that they can legally have, that’s what the Second Amendment is for and that’s what it talks about. What I was referring to all the carnage I’ve seen and all the operating that I’ve seen that’s been caused by those weapons falling in the wrong hands. But I subsequently had multiple conversations with the NRA leadership and a lot of people who knew a lot more about it than I did and I tried to make it very clear to people that the second amendment is there for a very important reason.
Number one, to make sure that the citizens could assist the military in case of invasion, and to think that that is farfetched, all you have to do is go to the Middle East and see some of the things that are happening there. I have a friend who is a missionary doctor, called me two weeks ago quite distressed, he was over in Iraq, went back to one of the villages that they had helped in before and it was desolate, ISIS had gotten there before them, killed all the men, taken the women captive, I mean, if those people had the ability to defend themselves maybe that wouldn’t have happened. To think that we are completely isolated from that I think is silly, particularly knowing that there are cells in this country right now.
But the most important reason for the Second Amendment is so that our people could protect themselves in case our government went off the rails and started thinking it could dominate the people. You know, we think that that is farfetched but you know you look at what has happened historically to nations where the government did become tyrannical and what did they do first? Get rid of people’s guns. Get rid of people’s guns rights. It was Thomas Hobbes, the English philosopher of the 17th century when talking about tyranny in Europe, he said it would never occur in America because American citizens have guns and they won’t let it happen. 

Couple of problems here.   First, Iraq was and is awash in guns.  Even during the nearly four decades of Saddam Hussein's dictatorship, an Iraqi citizen could purchase and possess as many firearms as they could buy--even fully automatic weapons.
Second, Thomas Hobbes.  Was he time-traveler?  Considering Hobbes died in 1679 - how did he know so much about America?
Third, Hobbes again.  Hobbes was a big, big proponent of absolute monarchy.  As such, all monarchies really dislike the idea of popular rebellion.