Finally a good solution in the public sphere, employing some form of compromise and goodwill, rather than the ramming through according to what I want, what I think is better, even against significant numbers of other people.
Barkat's new position (though he says it is not new) is that the right thing to do in Jerusalem would be to get one Zionist Rabbi appointed, and one Haredi rabbi appointed.
Barkat said there are various and diverse opinions as to what should be in Jerusalem. I believe the right thing for Jerusalem is to have one Zionist rabbi and one Haredi rabbi. This is what I believed in the past, and also today. I believe we are not far from starting the engines on the process of selecting 2 chief rabbis for the city. It is important for the city that they should represent all sectors - religious, haredi and secular. The challenge is for us to bring honor to Jerusalem via the selection of the rabbonim who will know to embrace and connect to all communities in the city.
As long as the model of two chief and city rabbis is still in effect, this is a good compromise position. The only problem is that there will still be fights, even if the proposal is accepted - Shas will want the Haredi rav to be from Shas, for the Sephardi position, while UTJ will want the Sephardi Chief Rabbi to be Zionist and the Ashkenazi rabbi to be Haredi. I don't know if the Zionist community will have a preference as to which rabbi is Zionist.