Entertainment Magazine

Steven Spielbeg Is Simply the Latest in a Long Line to Weigh in on Superhero Movie Fatigue

Posted on the 03 September 2015 by Weminoredinfilm.com @WeMinoredInFilm

A pause and a slight, barely audible sigh followed by a well-rehearsed answer. That's how I would describe the moment in-between when the question was asked to when the answer was delivered at the "Buyer's "panel at this year's ATX Festival in Austin, Texas. Various development executives from HBO, Starz, NBC and Fox were on hand to share their experiences with developing and buying TV shows. The inevitable moment came when the moderator asked the panelists just why TV is being overrun by so many reboots, remakes, revivals and adaptations. However, she almost immediately apologized, adding that while she's sure everyone has already asked them that kind question it's still a question that begs to be asked.

That's how it is when a topic has reached critical mass. You simply must ask everyone involved to offer their take on it, to the point that "so-and-so celebrity said this thing about the same old topic" headlines are almost omnipresent. The same is true right now on the film side of Hollywood where the questions of the moment revolve around the need for better gender and minority representation, the death of the mid-budget film, the over-reliance on CGI, the ever-looming importance of China and how quickly we're supposedly approaching superhero movie fatigue, i.e., the argument that sooner, rather than later we'll get sick of these things ( I discussed the topic at length earlier this year). In the past 7-10 days, everyone from Spielberg to Quentin Tarantino to Henry Cavill to Emma Thompson has weighed in on the superhero movie fatigue debate.

Not surprisingly, the people in Hollywood who actually make superhero movies are more likely to bang the drum of "as long as we continue to change things up and experiment with various sub-genres and anti-heroes we'll be okay" whereas those outside of it see a long history of Hollywood bubbles that always burst eventually, even if they come back again.

Here are all the pertinent quotes, roughly organized from most recent to oldest:

Steven Spielberg, from an Associated Press interview discussing his new movie Bridge of Spies You caused a stir two years ago when you predicted Hollywood was headed toward an "implosion" because of the over-abundance of mega-budget movies. Do you still feel that way?

I do. I still feel that way. We were around when the Western died and there will be a time when the superhero movie goes the way of the Western. It doesn't mean there won't be another occasion where the Western comes back and the superhero movie someday returns. Of course, right now the superhero movie is alive and thriving. I'm only saying that these cycles have a finite time in popular culture. There will come a day when the mythological stories are supplanted by some other genre that possibly some young filmmaker is just thinking about discovering for all of us.

Emma Thompson, from a "just for the heck of it" chat with Vulture

I loved the original Superman with Chris Reeve because there was a real tongue-in-cheek-ness to it. After a while, you do get a tiny bit cynical about it. The fact that I know they're going to win out in the end has now slightly interfered with my continuing to go to those movies. If I see yet another Spider-Man, I'm going to have to actually hang myself. I can't do it anymore! They're all marvelous, but how many times can you make this franchise, for crying out loud? [...] I'm up for Wonder Woman, totally.

Quentin Tarantio, from a long, varied interview with Vulture What do you make of the recent glut of superhero movies?

I've been reading comic books since I was a kid, and I've had my own Marvel Universe obsessions for years. So I don't really have a problem with the whole superhero thing right now, except I wish I didn't have to wait until my 50s for this to be the dominant genre. Back in the '80s, when movies sucked - I saw more movies then than I'd ever seen in my life, and the Hollywood bottom-line product was the worst it had been since the '50s - that would have been a great time.

Would you have made one?

No, I was still working at a video store! But I would have gone to see them. That was my time. I was in my 20s and would have been just like the guys at Comic-Con now who go see every DC and Marvel movie. But I'm in my 50s now, so I don't see all of them.

Henry Cavill, talking to Judao while promoting Man from U.N.C.L.E.

If you don't want to/can't watch the video for any reason, here's the part about superhero movie fatigue:

I think it's anything which is prevalent and on top people are going to complain about. At the moment, the superhero genre is the most prevalent genre out there despite the fact that the spy genre is so strong this year. That's just the nature of it. It's one of those decade long genres, the superhero thing, which is going to keep on going and people will complain about it all the time, of course. The secondary genre each year will change, and this year it just so happened to be spy.

Kevin Feige, from a RollingStone cover story promoting Avengers: Age of Ultron

if you look through the decades of people who've been accused of [ruining movies], we're in good company. ruined Hollywood, Steven Spielberg ruined Hollywood - I'll be in that company any day of the week. But the truth is, we don't spend a lot of time looking at that stuff because we're too busy trying to make the movies. I haven't been involved in a project that's been nominated for an Independent Spirit award, but I imagine those people put all their blood, sweat, and tears into it to try to get it done. That's exactly what we do over here every single day.

As soon as there are a bunch of them that are terrible, that's when it will end. I don't believe in the superhero-movie genre. With Guardians of the Galaxy, we wanted to do a big space movie; with we wanted to do a heist movie; Winter Solider, we wanted to do a political thriller. I'm more entertained by all of those kind of movies when there's superheroes in the middle of them, so that works out for me. But, I do believe and hope that that's what we'll continue to sustain, at least the ones we're responsible for. The other ones we have nothing to do with - and we go see them when they come out on opening weekend."

Joss Whedon, from the same RollingStone cover story

The Marvel paradigm is new and is being copied by a lot of people, because it worked. But they're being blamed for something that happened long before comic books became the basis for a lot of these blockbusters. And that doesn't mean that there isn't a trend that might be damaging where all the studios are putting all the money on the end of one thing and the smaller movies are getting edged out. That is happening - but I believe that has been happening for a while now, and that's not something that I'm thrilled about."

But I come at this from exactly one place. Is it good? Is it worth it? Did we give the people what they need? Did I tell a story that meant something, [that's] going to excite people and move them? That goes for the cheapest TV show I've ever worked on, too. And, you know, is it cynical that some studios are rolling out all these connected movies? When has Hollywood not been cynical? When was Hollywood run by a bunch of artists? Even United Artists wasn't for a long time. As for whether the paradigm will sustain itself or whether or not people will get sick of superheroes, who knows? Sure, I could stand to make a movie where guys don't have to be sewn into their outfits. That would be fun. But a lot of vitriol has come Kevin's way and Marvel's way. I think perhaps that is misguided.

Zack Snyder, from EW's Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice cover story

If [this gеnrе] tаlks аbоut us аnd thе humаn соnditiоn, whiсh I think hоpеfully thеsе mоviеs dо in sоmе wаy, thеn I think thаt it dоеsn't rеаlly hаvе аn еxpirаtiоn dаtе," the filmmaker revealed. "But l dо bеliеvе thе sоrt оf mаss-mаrkеtеd соnsumеrist vеrsiоn соuld gеt thin if yоu'rе nоt саrеful. Wе'vе just gоt tо bе саrеful."

Matthew Vaughn, talking to the Empire podcast while promoting Kingsman: The Secret Service

I love superhero films. I'm a bit nervous that they're going to die soon. They're going to make too many of them. Hollywood's track record is that if a lot of films are going to get made most of them aren't going to be good. So, what kills genres off is when everyone goes, "Alright, we're going to do westerns." Thousands of westerns get made. Most of them start turning out to be bad, and there's no more interest in westerns anymore. Pirate movies - they got killed, and then it took [Pirates of the] Caribbean to rescue them again. There was a moment pre-Sam Raimi Spider-Man where no one wanted to do any superhero films. I remember when the first X-Men was made everyone was laughing, going, "Really? The X-Men?" Things repeat themselves. History repeats itself. It seems to be every week there's an announcement of a new superhero film about to be made, and they're all very similar.

If you think about the superhero film, the formula and the characterization and what makes them work are quite similar. There are just different costumes and powers and stuff, but after a while people are going to get bored of it. I hope not because I love superhero films, but they're going to have to keep evolving. Whether they will or not, I don't know.

Back to Featured Articles on Logo Paperblog