Bloomberg terminal
The full rebirth of David Roberson's $75-million lawsuit against his former employer, Drummond Company, and Balch & Bingham has drawn the attention of the national media. The Roberson case came roaring back to life on January 21 when the Alabama Supreme Court reversed itself . . . and found a Jefferson County circuit judge wrongfully dismissed . . . claims against the Birmingham law firm. Drummond already had failed in its efforts to be dismissed from the lawsuit, so the 1/21 ruling means Roberson's $75-million lawsuit will move forward against both the coal giant and its law firm.
The reversal did not escape the attention of Bloomberg News, according to a report at banbalch.com (BB). Writes BB Publisher K.B. Forbes:
We called the Alabama Supreme Court decision on ex-Drummond executive David Roberson’s $75 million civil suit a possible “lethal blow” to embattled law firm Balch & Bingham.
Now the national media has begun focusing on the narrative and the initial reports appear to be devastating.
Bloomberg News writes:
Roberson sued [Balch & Bingham] and his former employer in March 2019, alleging negligence, fraud, suppression, and implied imdemnity against the firm.
Alabama’s top court…grant[ed] an application for rehearing on claims against Balch & Bingham for misrepresention and concealment based on allegations that Roberson had previously asked the firm’s in-house ethics attorneys if the plan for which he was convicted was legal.
Misrepresention and concealment are stinging words but accurate.
Forbes traces the Bloomberg report to the testimony of Balch attorney Chad Pilcher in the North Birmingham Superfund bribery trial:
During Day 11 (July 11, 2018) of the criminal trial of the North Birmingham Bribery Scandal, we posted:
The real bomb that dropped today was that of Chad Pilcher, a Balch & Bingham government affairs attorney who testified that he warned [Balch partner] Joel Gilbert about using State Representative Oliver Robinson’s position or letterhead. Pilcher regularly consults with the Alabama Ethics Commission, he testified.
John Archibald of AL.com tweet[ed]:
Pilcher said he warned Gilbert that Robinson could not use his official position or letterhead to help. Gilbert, documents show, edited Robinson’s position into letters sent in Robinson’s name.
Pilcher is the first Balch lawyer on the stand who remembers his advice and involvement, and who recalls the Robinson contract and states his questions about pitfalls of hiring a legislator to carry your water. Was worried that Robinson himself broke the law, so he told Gilbert.
Kyle Whitmire commented that the testimony not only hurts the defendants, it “makes the defense attorneys look stupid. This whole trial, they’ve been setting up Pilcher to be the guy who gave the OK.”
Things got even messier when another Balch attorney, Joel Gilbert, took the stand:
Two days later on Day 13 of the trial (July 16, 2018) , Gilbert was grilled by the prosecution. As we wrote at the time:
John Archibald of AL.com tweets what appears to be the most damning exchanges:
Gilbert wrote letters for Shelby, Sessions, he said. For Mayor Tuck in Tarrant and resolutions for Jeffco and Tarrant. And more. Only elected official B/B had contract with was Oliver Robinson, he says.
Gilbert acknowledges he didn’t talk to his firm’s “ethics people” (Greg Butrus) until at least a year after he contracted Oliver Robinson. Didn’t tell the “ethics people” Robinson met with EPA and AEMC etc. etc.
Although Roberson’s lawsuit is under seal, locked away in a secret Star Chamber, the testimony at the criminal trial was stunning and hit hard.
Balch-made millionaire Gilbert appears to have concealed the truth from Roberson. Balch says in court pleadings that the firm “owed no duty” to Roberson and while Balch attorneys testify that misleading or lying to Roberson with wrong or untruthful advice is a bona-fide legal service.
Bona-fide idiots, indeed!