I know, I know, I shouldn't bait the angry bear of radical Biblists, but...
I kinda REALLY RESPECT most of what I've seen (on the scientific i.e. observational, level) by proto-Electric Universe-ist Dr Donal Patten, from the 1970s; I really do. I just wish he WASN'T a rallying on a Creationist i.e. someone who believes the Genesis part of the Bible, ticket. If he hadn't been, however, he'd have never pursued the 'science' he did try to uncover from the myth - so take it with the salt. But take it for what it is, i.e. scientific observation of the geological facts.
This kind of re-apportioning of historical record reminds me of the way Talbott/Thornhill take influence from ancient myths to propose a proto-Saturn model for our earliest Sun, our brown-dwarf planetary-momma. Let's see what happens in coming years - iff electro-astronomy is recognised.
Debate Magazine
