"... This Understanding Saves Us from So Many Pitfalls in Mis-reading of Scripture"

Two weeks before resigning the papacy, Pope Benedict XVI delivered the following in an address before the clergy of Rome:

I remember more or less the formula "non omnis certitudo de veritatibus fidei potest sumi ex Sacra Scriptura", in other words, the Church’s certainty about her faith is not born only of an isolated book, but has need of the Church herself as a subject enlightened and guided by the Holy Spirit. Only then does the Scripture speak with all its authority.

This phrase is decisive, I would say, for showing the Church’s absolute necessity, and thus understanding the meaning of Tradition, the living body in which this word draws life from the outset and from which it receives its light, in which it is born. The fact of the canon of Scripture is already an ecclesial fact: that these writings are Scripture is the result of an illumination of the Church, who discovered in herself this canon of Scripture; she discovered it, she did not create it; and always and only in this communion of the living Church can one really understand and read the Scripture as the word of God, as a word which guides us in life and in death.

Fr. Denis Lemieux uses those words and expounds:

We tend to think of things in terms of competitive opposites: Scripture or Tradition, the Word of God or the teaching authority of the Church. The more we can understand that God is the primary actor in the life of the Church and of salvation history, the more we can move out of this strange quasi-Marxist power struggle view of revelation and ‘who is in charge, who gets the last word’ being the most important question.

God reveals Himself to a body of believers, giving them a written inspired text and a living Tradition, and above all his Holy Spirit to abide with them to condition and guide their reception and interpretation of the revealed truth. It is a messy process, imperfect because sinful human beings are imperfect, but nonetheless that is our Catholic understanding of it.

And this understanding saves us from so many pitfalls in mis-reading of Scripture. One example, which is commonplace today. The exegete Rudolph Bultmann famously said that it is impossible to believe in miracles in the age of radio waves and antibiotics. Hence the miracle stories in the Bible are symbolic or legendary or something: at any rate, not to be taken literally. The dead cannot be raised, nor the blind healed, nor the lame walk, nor bread and fish multiplied. Of course not: we are modern scientific people, and know better.

Except… the Church has 2000 years of experience of, well, miracles performed by saints all over the place. Bultmann was a contemporary of Padre Pio! Lourdes is a place of ongoing miraculous healings. I personally know of instances of food being multiplied in soup kitchens for Christ’s poor. Miracles are not commonplace events of course—they wouldn’t be called miracles if they were. But if Bultmann was doing his exegesis within the catholic communion, he would never have written such a silly sentence.

That’s one example, and there are many others. It is the Church and its long experience of the ways of God in the world that conditions our reading of Scripture to keep it true to God’s Spirit. And that is how God’s revelation of love and saving power is passed on from one generation to the next, for 2000 years and counting.

Not sure how to end this frankly other than to acknowledge that not long ago, Pope Benedict's words and those of Fr. Lemieux would not have gone gone down well for me.  I was a Sola Scriptura guy and argued with many over the concept until it became clear, as I continued to read the Scriptures and read those who also read the Scriptures, that too many times the discussions led to petty semantics and ultimately futility and anger.  About the only thing we Protestants back then seemed to agree on was that Catholicism was our common enemy, that Catholicism didn't hold a high enough view of Scripture and that Tradition was anathema.

Of course, I don't see it that way any longer.

I've come to embrace Catholicism fully though I'm still finding things out about her.  What I do know is that each time I find something that seems off to me about the faith, my digging and research has brought me to an understanding not only of the truth but on what lousy foundations my original misgivings were built upon.

I am home.  I am staying.  I am convinced that though I continue to seek to gain a deeper understanding, I have found what I'm seeking.

Carry on.