The article is called “Mitt’s shameful Libya statement.”
Here’s how it starts:
That it’s fundamentally dishonest hasn’t stopped Mitt Romney from repeating his central critique of Barack Obama’s foreign policy over and over – the idea that the president “went around the world and apologized for America.” So it shouldn’t be surprising that Romney’s response to the attacks on U.S. diplomatic installations in Egypt and Libya was rooted in the same caricature of Obama as apologizer-in-chief.
“It’s disgraceful,” Romney’s statement, which was released late Tuesday night, read, “that the Obama administration’s first response was not to condemn attacks on our diplomatic missions, but to sympathize with those who waged the attacks.”
That’s not at all what happened, of course.
Read the rest HERE.
- Romney Campaign Attacks Obama Over Mythical Apology to Embassy Attackers (motherjones.com)
- This is what a Romney presidency would look like (salon.com)
- Romney Slams the Obama Administration’s Response to Embassy Attacks (nationalreview.com)
- Romney Calls Embassy Statement “Disgraceful” (buzzfeed.com)