I want to look at one text, Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. The story takes the form of a quest and so is rather explicitly about a journey. Setting aside a frame story, we can lay out the places as follows:
King Arthur’s Court: The story begins here and ends here. Bercilak’s court at Hautedesert: This is something of an anti-court (e.g. where a woman sits at the head of the table) and has some specific sub-spaces we’ll get to in a moment. The Green Chapel: This is the terminus of the quest. The hinterlands between the first three.Here’s how the story goes:
1) Frame material (about Troy and Britain). 2) A challenge, the beheading game, is proposed to Arthur’s knights in Arthur’s court at Camelot and Gawain accepts. Gawain prepares himself. 3) Gawain travels the hinterlands between Camelot and Hautedesert. 4) While at Hautedesert Gawain engages in an elaborate exchange with his host, Sir Bercilak. (we’ll look at this later.) 5) Gawain travels the hinterlands from Hautedesert to the Green Chapel. 6) Gawain completes the quest at the Green Chapel, and, as it turns out, the exchanges as well. 7) Gawain travels the hinterlands back to Camelot. 8) Return to Camelot. 9) Frame material.On each of three days at Hautedesert Gawain engages in an exchange with his host, Sir Bercilak. Bercilak goes hunting in the woods and Gawain is pursued by Bercilak’s wife in her bedroom. They exchange their “winnings” at the end of the end. So this involves the spaces: the woods, the bedroom, and a neutral place of exchange within the palace.
The narrative is very stylized and has a ritual feel to it. I’ve got quite a bit to say about these elements on the text and, in particular, about the exchanges, in this essay:
Sir Gawain and the Green Knight and the Semiotics of OntologyAlso see the following blog posts:
Being in Crisis and the Ontological Text
Structural Instability: Two Examples and a Question