Politics Magazine

More on the Electoral College

Posted on the 05 June 2011 by Erictheblue

I sent a version of my recent post on the Electoral College to the Star Tribune, which published it as a letter to the editor earlier this week.  My letter (you'll have to scroll past the first one) includes a link to the op-ed, by Andy Brehm, that I was attempting to rebut, and many of the online comments amplify points I made.  I mentioned, for example, that the states (and citizens) of New York, Texas, and California, which together have more than a quarter of the country's population, are ignored by presidential candidates during the general election campaign.  The commenter known as "mvymvy" elaborates:

The current system of electing the president ensures that the candidates, after the primaries, do not reach out to all of the states and their voters.  Candidates have no reason to poll, visit, advertise, organize, campaign, or care about the voter concerns in the dozens of states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind.  The reason for this is the state-by-state winner-take-all method (not mentioned in the US Constitution, but since enacted by 48 states), under which all of a state's electoral votes are awarded to the candidate who gets the most votes in each separate state.  Presidential candidates concentrate their attention on only a handful of closely divided "battleground" states and their voters.  In the 2012 election, pundits and campaign operatives agree already, that, at most, only 14 states and their voters will matter.  Almost 75% of the country will be ignored--including 19 of the 22 lowest population and medium-small states, and big states like CA, GA, NY, and TX.  This will be more obscene than the 2008 campaign, when candidates concentrated over 2/3rds of their campaign events and ad money in just 6 states, and 98% in just 15 states (CO, FL, IN, IA, MI, MN, MO, NV, NH, NM, NC, OH, PA, VA, and WI).  Over half (57%) of the events were in just 4 states (OH, FL, PA, and VA).  In 2004, candidates concentrated over 2/3rds of their money and campaign visits in just 5 states; over 80% in 9 states; and over 99% of their money in 16 states.  2/3rds of the states and people have been merely spectators to the presidential elections. . . . 

That was at 9:27 a.m. on May 16, the day Brehm's piece was published in the print edition.  Sixteen minutes later "mvymvy" weighed in again, this time to demolish Brehm's contention that, in a national popular vote presidential election, a candidate could prevail simply by running up big margins in the country's major cities.  The demographic and electoral arithmetic just does not add up.  Moreover, by the logic of Brehm's argument, states should adopt some sort of Rube Goldberg machine, along the line of the Electoral College, to give some clout to voters in small towns and rural areas in statewide elections, such as for Governor or US Senate.  But no one is calling for such a "solution" because the problem does not exist. 

Brehm's argument is so weak that one searches for hidden motives.  Another commenter, willysand, wonders how all this ink can be spilled over the Electoral College without a single mention of the election of 2000, when George W Bush, having lost the national popular vote by more than a half million ballots, nevertheless became president after the Supreme Court awarded him Florida's electoral votes.  When the Electoral College is up for discussion, that "election" is the elephant in the room, and Brehm, a Republican party activist, may feel obliged to defend the indefensible.  A vote for Bush counted more than a vote for Gore, and if you don't like it, you are an "orthodox majoritarian."  Horrors! 

One more time, louder: support National Popular Vote

 


You Might Also Like :

Back to Featured Articles on Logo Paperblog

These articles might interest you :

  • Murder on Alabama College Campus

    Murder Alabama College Campus

    Thomas Franklin May III One person was killed and four others injured in a shooting at the Southern Union State Community College in eastern Alabama... Read more

    By  Mikeb302000
    CURRENT, DEBATE, SOCIETY
  • Saturday Vids: Amy Poehler at Harvard College

    It is no secret to those who know me well that the women of SNL past and present are my personal pantheon of goddesses, to which I worship on a regular basis. Read more

    By  Juliez
    DEBATE, SOCIETY
  • More Cheating

    I recently saw a Seattle Times article that started like this: Georgia investigators have found evidence of cheating at close to 80 percent of the Atlanta... Read more

    By  Stevemiranda
    DEBATE, FAMILY, SCHOOLING, SOCIETY
  • College Confidential: Disorientation

    College Confidential: Disorientation

    The bottom line of college orientation is that it’s a paradox: feeling simultaneously deeply comforted and entirely thrown off your axis, spinning rapidly... Read more

    By  Juliez
    DEBATE, SOCIETY
  • The Abuse of the College Athlete

    Abuse College Athlete

    by ConroySeptember is always an exciting time in college life. The semester has just started, freshman are getting acclimated to campus life, students (most of... Read more

    By  Conroy
    DEBATE, SOCIETY, SPORTS
  • More Plans

    More Plans

    Just like that chair, I can't seem to get these houses out of my head, so much so, that I had to look through I Can Fly several times to make sure there... Read more

    By  Blemon
    ARTS & CRAFTS, HOME
  • Social Connection As Business Model for Helping College Applicants

    Social Connection Business Model Helping College Applicants

    It’s the end of another college application season.  High school seniors are waiting for the fat envelope.  High school juniors are being driven (or flown)... Read more

    By  Drpamelarutledge
    FAMILY, MEDIA, SCHOOLING, SOCIAL MEDIA, TECH

Magazines