Debate Magazine

Killer Arguments Against LVT, Not (342)

Posted on the 21 October 2014 by Markwadsworth @Mark_Wadsworth

MBK emailed in a splendid new variant of the "diagonal comparison" in The Times, it goes like this:
"If I am forced to pay LVT, then I will have less money to spend on [worthy cause]", in this case, charitable donations.
The author of the piece is so Home-Owner-Ist that he completely lacks any sort of perspective, he appears to think that he will garner sympathy with drivel like this:
I HAVE just been to the top floor of our house. I so rarely go there, it always comes as a surprise… I came downstairs, thinking, as I always do, where do all these rooms come from? Do I really own all this? Sorry, I mean we. My wife is joint owner. In fact for many years she was paid more than me…
We bought our house, in north London, in 1963 — three storeys, Victorian, for £5,000, after I negotiated down the price from £5,250. I tell locals this all the time — just to make them sick…
Our house today is technically a mansion, even though it has just two bedrooms. (We each have a writing room, plus two sitting rooms.) On paper it must be worth about £2.5m. That’s what one in our street has gone for…
I do know two widows who, like us, have been here for years, never knowing what would happen to our property prices, who will simply not be able to afford to pay a mansion tax every year. They could be forced to sell…
I will pay, and can afford to, but it could mean I will give less to charity. I was thinking of giving again to the Cumbria Community Fund, but won’t if I suddenly have to find £20,000 a year for the rest of my life.


You Might Also Like :

Back to Featured Articles on Logo Paperblog

These articles might interest you :

Magazine