Japanese Conservatives Must Affirm the Postwar Regime ChangePosted on the 10 November 2012 by Shahalexander
Rather, I would propose that Japan affirm the postwar regime change for much more active role in the Western alliance. Remember that all LDP leaders since the Koizumi administration supported regime changes in Iraq and Afghanistan led by the United States, both of which are modeled after postwar Japan and Germany. Logically, it does not make sense to support Middle East democratization, while denouncing “imposed” reforms by US led occupational forces. Ever since Junnichiro Koizumi, LDP prime ministers endorsed regime changes to win the War on Terror and stop nuclear proliferation, particularly to terrorist organizations like Al Qaeda. I have no doubt in their sincerity to stand with American forces to overthrow Saddam Hussein and Taliban. Koizumi’s successors were in his cabinet when both wars broke out. Taro Aso advocated the Arch of Freedom and Prosperity, which was in line with the Bush administration’s initiatives. Though the Obama administration decided to withdraw troops from both countries while terrorism is still strong, the global community explores to help their reconstruction and train their security forces, including war opponents like France and Germany. Japan has hosted the International Conference on the Reconstruction of Afghanistan.
Therefore, instead of quibbling over US occupational rule in the past, Japan should act as a role model of model of regime change from the Middle East to China, including Tibet, East Turkistan. That is, Japan can show the successful step toward democracy, and persuade citizens in those countries to follow the same path. This will bolster Japan’s position on the global stage. Remember that there is nothing wring with Japan’s support for regime changes in Iraq and Afghanistan. Japanese leaders should be more confident of it.
I have no objection to change obsolete and dysfunctional regardless of ideology. DPJ (Democratic Party Japan) liberals like Yukio Hatoyama, Naoto Kan, and Katsuya Okada also insisted on reviewing postwar Japanese politics with regard to the US-Japanese alliance and Kasumigaseki bureaucracy, which simply resulted in paralyzing Japanese domestic politics and worsening relations with the United States. It is quite worrisome that the global public will misinterpret the “Reconsideration of the Postwar Regime” as a complete denial of regime changes and democratization in both Japan and Germany. Furthermore, Japan would be isolated from both Asia and the West if such misinterpretation prevails.
Let me talk about US-Japanese relations. Japan handlers in Washington political corridor may be generous to Japanese conservative aspiration to “independence” as ling as they are sincere to develop security partnership against threats in East Asia like China and North Korea, and on the global stage like Al Qaeda, Iran, and so forth. However, not all Americans share such mindsets, and some media may cast doubt on inconsistency to advocate close US-Japanese alliance and collective security against autocracies while denouncing an imposed regime change by Douglas McArthur. This can lead Japan to be isolated from democratic partners both in Asia and the West. The core of postwar regime change is the pacifist constitution. It has already accomplished a historical role to impress the regime change, but that role is over as global security environment has changed. Therefore, I am in full support of changing the constitution.
It is understandable that not everything of postwar occupational rule was good. Also, not everything of prewar Japan was bad. The Taisho democracy was a marvelous achievement. While Meiji reforms are heavily dependent on Western thoughts introduced by elites, Taisho movements are initiated entirely by Japanese grassroots. It was beyond universal suffrage. Women and burakumin (social outcastes) stood up to improve their social position. People’s demand for freedom and equality spread nation wide. Had the Taisho democracy been successful, Japan could have democratized Prussian styled Meiji constitution without any foreign intervention. Regretfully, the Taisho democracy was destroyed by itself, just as the Weimar democracy in Germany did, which gave way to militarism. That is why we have to review the prewar political culture critically.
Currently, Shinzo Abe is most likely to succeed Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda. In view of the lost 20 years, obsolete and dysfunctional systems should be dismantled. But whoever the next prime minister is, or whatever the leader’s ideological standpoint is, it is necessary to clarify the meaning of a “reconsideration of the postwar regime”, in order to avoid unnecessary misunderstandings both globally and domestically. Along with Germany, Japan is a role model to prevail democracy throughout the world, and this is the vital point to for Japan to deepen the alliance with the United States, develop strategic partnership with free nations of the West and Asia, and enhance its presence on the global stage. Remember Iraq and Afghanistan!
These articles might interest you :
When the rot begins, how quickly it seeps through everything. “Don’t ask, don’t tell” (DADT) was the official United States policy on service by gays and... Read moreThe 12 June 2015 by Eowyn
DEBATE, POLITICS, SOCIETY, SPIRITUALITY
Thursday is grocery shopping day. I want to go early since it is supposed to be very hot and my car AC doesn't work anymore. My usual routine is suspended for... Read moreThe 11 June 2015 by Elizabethprata
Muslim children are being watched closely for signs of radicalisation. Anything from not celebrating Christmas to shunning art and drama is now grounds for... Read moreThe 11 June 2015 by Mfrancoiscerrah
The Republican's have been recently trying to scare Americans -- using the recent success of ISIS in Iraq and Syria. They want Americans to think that we must... Read moreThe 11 June 2015 by Jobsanger
A little truth about the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) from Green Party Shadow Cabinet member Jim Goodman: “The TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) is not a... Read moreThe 11 June 2015 by Jobsanger
Sam writes: “…Those dark people she calls inferior are the ones who created the great Indus Valley Civilization…” Maybe they didn’t . Read moreThe 11 June 2015 by Calvinthedog
By RF SchattenWhat's a few Degrees or a few Feet more?!?!? If you care about your planet, if you care about your environment...the ability to breath clean air a... Read moreThe 10 June 2015 by Rfschatten
MOST POPULAR FROM DEBATE
- Free Planet - the global lending library - return it in as good a state as you borrowed it by Freeplanet
- Proof that “liberalism is a mental illness” in one sentence by Eowyn
- Toxic News by Eowyn
- Daily Mail on top form by Markwadsworth
MOST RECOMMENDED IN DEBATE
- Judicial Tyranny: Dissenting opinions on Supreme Court’s ruling on homosexual marriage by Eowyn
- 2/3 of Puerto Ricans may flee to U.S. and overwhelm govt services by Eowyn
- Why businesses go homo by Eowyn
- Proof that “liberalism is a mental illness” in one sentence by Eowyn