Culture Magazine

Friday Fotos: Some Styles at the Demolition Exhibition [#GVM004]

By Bbenzon @bbenzon

20150430-_IGP3307

AIDS crew

Tomorrow (Saturday, June 28, 2015) marks the official opening of Green Villain’s Demolition Exhibition, a show of graffti installed (good Art Word, that) on 30,000 sq. feet of walls in the Newport area of Jersey City. Of course artists and others have been in and out of the building for the last two months, so the boundary between official opening hours and the rest of time and space is somewhat porous. But that will all come to an end sometime in July, when the building is demolished and returned to dust.
With all that in mind, I thought I’d offer a few comments on some of the styles in view. As far as I know graffiti styles have not been subject to classification and analysis beyond the standard distinction between wild style, in which the letters and cut up, confused, and disguised, and all the rest. So there is no official nomenclature. Nor do I intend to introduce any here.
But I do think it’s useful/helpful to note that it’s not all alike, especially if you’re not familiar with graffiti.
* * * * *
These pieces exhibit a ‘flat’ style, which may be the most common style in the show. There may be some 3D cues here and there, but they’re minimal. There’s no attempt to imply and overall 3D space. Notice the way patterns are deployed across the surfaces of the letters:

20150605-_IGP3946

Revenge

20150527-_IGP3848

Enoe

20150605-_IGP3993

SNOE

This, in some ways, is flat. But the 3D cues (drop shadows) are very strong, though there is no overall 3D space:

20150605-_IGP3964

Knows


Here we’ve got a 3D space, though it’s shallow:

20150527-_IGP3909

SPone

The next two have quite a different feel. They’re more ‘biomorphic’. It’s not simply that the forms are rounded, but they give a sense of plant growth. Note that the first has strong 3D cues while the second does not:

20150613-_IGP4080

Twerk

20150605-_IGP4024

Mustart

This too has a somewhat biomorphic feel, but it’s less contained than the previous two and the detailing is styled somewhat differently:

20150527-_IGP3890

CREEP

And then there’s this, which all but explodes off the wall:

20150610-_IGP4036

Jahan Loh

Finally, a footprint:

20150610-_IGP4060

Homer Sapiens

I rather suspect that it wasn’t deliberate. It just happened.

Back to Featured Articles on Logo Paperblog