Biology Magazine

Evolutionary Psychology: The Science of Human Nature

Posted on the 17 March 2011 by Allen_macneill
Evolutionary Psychology: The Science of Human Nature
Having been tickled by Google Alert that my name had been mentioned in the comments at Pharyngula (P. Z. Myer's blog), I took a quick look. Just a few comments for now:
1) I became an evolutionary psychologist when studying the behavioral ecology of Microtus pennsylvanicus got boring. Those cute little field voles got boring because their ethology is relatively simple. Human ethology is a lot more interesting, mostly because it is a lot more complex. Should we not try to study it because it is more complex? Or because it might not jibe with some people's political preconceptions?
2) I assign Gould & Lewontin's "spandrels" paper to my students in evolutionary biology, along with various criticisms of it. I also assign Eldredge & Gould's "punk eek" paper and Gould and Vrba's "exaptation" paper (along with close to three dozen others, not to mention the entire Origin of Species, 1st. ed.). I also give them chunks of George William's 1966 classic, Adaptation and Natural Selection, so that they will know exactly how "onerous" the concept of "adaptation" actually is.
3) Here's the definition of "adaptation" I use:
An evolutionary adaptation is any heritable phenotypic character whose frequency of appearance in a population is the result of increased reproductive success relative to alternative versions of that heritable phenotypic character.
4) Here are the criteria I believe are most useful when one is attempting to determine if one is dealing with an "adaptation":
Qualification 1: An evolutionary adaptation will be expressed by most of the members of a given population, in a pattern that approximates a normal distribution;
Qualification 2: An evolutionary adaptation can be correlated with underlying anatomical and physiological structures, which constitute the efficient (or proximate) cause of the evolution of the adaptation;
Qualification 3: An evolutionary adaptation can be correlated with a pre-existing evolutionary environment of adaptation (EEA), the circumstances of which can then be correlated with differential survival and reproduction; and
Qualification 4: An evolutionary adaptation can be correlated with the presence and expression of an underlying gene or gene complex, which directly or indirectly causes and influences the expression of the phenotypic trait that constitutes the adaptation.
To me, it seems reasonable that if one can apply those to a specific human behavior, one can make arguments about its evolutionary derivation. Would anyone disagree?
As for the ridiculous idea that evolutionary psychology only deals with sex, has anyone making such a claim actually read a textbook on the subject? Here are several:
Human Evolutionary Psychology
Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind (4th Edition)
Evolution and Human Behavior, 2nd Edition: Darwinian Perspectives on Human Nature
Evolutionary Psychology: The Science of Human Nature
[Full Disclosure Notice: The fourth title is indeed by Yours Truly.]
If you haven't, then please do so, and then we can discuss these questions.
While we're on the subject, Part II of Evolutionary Psychology: The Science of Human Nature (on the ethology of between-group behavior in humans) is coming out in May. My next project is an introductory textbook in evolutionary biology, entitled Evolutionary Biology: The Darwinian Revolutions, again in two parts. Part I (due out in September) is The Modern Synthesis and Part II (due out next May) is The Evolving Synthesis.
After that (if I live that long) will be On Purpose: The Evolution of Design by Means of Natural Selection (won't there be some fireworks when that comes out?), in which I present one of the core arguments for The Metaphysical Foundations of the Biological Sciences, in the spirit of E. A. Burtt's The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science. Should be fun!
As always, comments, criticisms, and suggestions are warmly welcomed!

You Might Also Like :

Back to Featured Articles on Logo Paperblog

These articles might interest you :

  • The Comb of Science

    Comb Science

    You don’t need expensive equipment to do a science experiment! You can do one with an ordinary plastic comb. Tear a small scrap of tissue paper into little... Read more

    By  Jerry At Ays
  • 50 Years Of Human Spaceflight

    Years Human Spaceflight

    Today, 50 years ago, Yuri Gagarin's single orbit of Earth ushered in the era of human spaceflight. Colonel Yuri Alekseyevich Gagarin was the first human to... Read more

    By  Gerard
  • The Sins of an Evolutionary Psychologist

    In a recent essay on the cult of David Foster Wallace, Nathan Heller notes that DFW’s mature work deals with the crisis of contemporary pluralism: “how to... Read more

    By  Cris
  • How Science Made Your Dino Toys Extinct

    Science Made Your Dino Toys Extinct

    Remember when you were a kid how dinosaurs were the coolest ever? In particular, the stories of Big Three - the brontosaurus, the triceratops, and the... Read more

    By  Gerard
  • When Kids Really Had Fun With Science

    When Kids Really With Science

    image credit Today we have made leaps and bounds in science that we couldn't even imagine 50 years ago. You'd think the science toys of our age would be... Read more

    By  Gerard
  • “Spirituality” as Evolutionary Byproduct

    “Spirituality” Evolutionary Byproduct

    A friend recently pointed me to Michael Graziano’s article “Is Spirituality a Byproduct of Evolution?” Because it is posted over at Huff or Fluff-Po, I was... Read more

    By  Cris
  • Are Beautiful People 'Selfish By Nature'?

    People with symmetrical faces are more self-sufficient and less likely to co-operate, new research suggests. Kate Moss, George Clooney, Natalie Portman or... Read more

    By  Gerard