Debate Magazine

Evolution of Religion Project: Is “Adaptation” Code for “Design”?

Posted on the 18 April 2011 by Cris

 

Several  months ago I became aware of the “Evolution of Religion” project, which maintains a website here. I did not find it particularly interesting because it was immediately apparent that the project was designed to prove a particular point. We need look no further than the project’s subtitle to ascertain the a priori commitment that guides its research: “The Adaptive Logic of Religious Beliefs and Behavior.”

Splendid. Here we have what is supposed to be a scientific project specifically designed to prove that “religion” evolved because it is adaptive. This sounds like a perfect recipe for confirmation bias to me. It also feels like an agenda.

To understand what may be going on here, let’s look at the “Aims” of the project:

To many scholars, religious beliefs and behaviors appear so bizarre and so costly that they fall outside rational explanation, leading instead to explanations based on psychosis, cognitive accidents, or cultural parasites.

The aim of our project is to conduct a scientific examination of exactly the opposite hypothesis—that religious beliefs and behavior confer adaptive advantages to individual believers, and were therefore favored by natural selection over human evolutionary history. In other words, religion may have evolved.

This is quite revealing. In one corner, we have evolutionary scholars who argue that what we today call “religion” is not the result of targeted selection and is maladaptive. They are mostly atheists. In the other corner, we have evolutionary scholars who argue that we today call “religion” is the result of targeted selection and is adaptive. My educated guess is that some or several are believers.

While I do not have a problem with scholars being atheists or believers, I do have a problem with research that is designed to prove a metaphysical point. This becomes even more of a problem when personal biases or conflicts of interest are not fully disclosed.

As for the latter, it is good to see that the Evolution of Religion project acknowledges that it is “generously supported by the John Templeton Foundation.” For those unfamiliar with the John Templeton Foundation, its history, agenda, and support for particular kinds of research, I encourage you to read about it here.


You Might Also Like :

Back to Featured Articles on Logo Paperblog

These articles might interest you :

  • Methodology & “Evolution of Religion”

    Methodology “Evolution Religion”

    Over the past decade several books and articles have appeared which purport to explain the “evolution of religion” as an adaptation, usually invoking group leve... Read more

    By  Cris
    BIOLOGY, BOOKS, DEBATE, HISTORY, RELIGION
  • Chinese Religion Redux

    Chinese Religion Redux

    As Cold War propaganda in the West would have it, communist states were to be despised because they were atheist and Godless. The reality, however, was quite... Read more

    By  Cris
    CULTURE, DEBATE, HISTORY, RELIGION
  • Mesopotamian Religion: Prelude to Axial Age

    Mesopotamian Religion: Prelude Axial

    Between 800 and 200 BCE, a remarkable series of sages, mystics, and thinkers gave rise to the transcendental traditions that are known today as “world... Read more

    By  Cris
    CULTURE, DEBATE, HISTORY, RELIGION
  • Etruscan Rite & Roman Religion

    Etruscan Rite Roman Religion

    “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.” With this famous sentence, Jean-Jacques Rousseau begins his masterful critique of political power. Read more

    By  Cris
    BIOLOGY, CULTURE, DEBATE, HISTORY, RELIGION
  • Democommie on Guns as Religion

    From democommie When logic fails, there's always religion. From a speech by Barack Obama in 2008. ''So it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, they... Read more

    By  Mikeb302000
    DEBATE
  • Religious Evolution: Sami Sticks & Phoenician Stones

    Unlike living organisms, cultural formations do not “evolve.” Evolution, sensu stricto, is a biological process and not a cultural one. Read more

    By  Cris
    BIOLOGY, RELIGION, SCIENCE
  • The Fine Line of Religion

    At the end of most of my Yoga classes I do a reading. Since I started teaching, most of my readings have been from Deborah Adele's Yamas and Niyamas. I love thi... Read more

    By  Nadine
    FITNESS, RELIGION, SPIRITUALITY

Magazines