Dems Surrender To GOP On FilibusterPosted on the 25 January 2013 by Jobsanger
As we all know, the United States Senate has been in a state of gridlock for the last few years. Although the Democrats had a majority in that legislative body, they have been unable to even get their bills to the Senate floor, let alone to a vote. This is because of the Republicans abuse of the filibuster. They have chosen to filibuster nearly every single bill, making it impossible to pass any bill without a super-majority of 60 votes (the number required to end a filibuster).
This was never the intention of the Founding Fathers, who never included a filibuster option in the Constitution. They wanted Senate bills to be decided by a majority vote -- not a super-majority. The filibuster is a rule passed by the senators themselves, and could have been changed by senators when considering rules at the beginning of the 113th Congress. And for a while, it looked like real change might come -- a change that would prevent the Republicans from obstructing anything the Democrats tried to do.
We even heard tough talk from Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada). He said there would be significant change in the filibuster in this new Congress, and even threatened to use the so-called "nuclear option" (changing the rules with a simple majority of 51 votes) to get the needed change. But the Majority Leader was lying. There were good proposals for changing the filibuster rule from Senators Harkin (D-Iowa) and Merkley (D-Oregon), but Reid did not push for the adoption of either of these excellent proposals -- instead opting to accept a "compromise" (surrender) proposal.
That "compromise" made very little change to the rules. It does allow some minor appointments to be dealt with more quickly, and guarantees the Republicans have an opportunity to submit at least two amendments to any bill brought to the floor (which they should have already had the right to do) -- but it doesn't go much farther. It still allows the Republicans to filibuster (without actually having to keep the floor and do a talking filibuster) any bill they want (and you can bet they'll do that after their amendments are defeated). This "compromise" means it will still require 60 votes to pass any bill in the Senate.
That means there will still be gridlock in the Senate -- and the chance of getting important legislation on job creation, gun restrictions, immigration reform, and other issues is now almost nonexistent. If these bills could pass the Senate, they would go to a conference committee where a compromise might be worked out with the House. But if they are filibustered in the Senate (and required to get 60 votes), then the chance of any compromise resulting in a new law grows much dimmer.
Besides Majority Leader Reid, the other Democratic architects of this surrender to the Republicans are Senators Levin (Michigan), Schumer (New York), Pryor (Arkansas), and Cardin (Maryland). In my opinion, these cowards deserve the scorn of progressives everywhere.
These articles might interest you :
The congressional Republicans have been doing a lot of complaining about the deficit and the growing national debt. That complaining is more than a little... Read moreThe 04 January 2013 by Jobsanger
The graphic above (from Wikipedia) shows the electoral college vote in the 2012 election (weighted by the size of each state's electoral vote). It does not pain... Read moreThe 19 January 2013 by Jobsanger
Texas Democrats have been a dispirited bunch for a long time now. It has been more than twenty years since a Democrat held statewide office, and prospects for... Read moreThe 27 June 2013 by Jobsanger
The Republicans have given up on trying to use the "fiscal ceiling" threat to force cuts to Social Security and Medicare. They finally realize they have no... Read moreThe 30 December 2012 by Jobsanger
A couple of nights ago, a few Republican House members joined Democrats and made sure that taxes won't go up for over 98% of Americans. Read moreThe 03 January 2013 by Jobsanger
By Susan Duclos Byron York reports that as of Tuesday it will be 1, 350 days since the Democratically controlled Senate has passed a budget. That is three... Read moreThe 08 January 2013 by Susanduclos
ECONOMICS, POLITICS, SOCIETY
The Republicans haven't been very popular lately. Even though they talk of rebranding themselves, they continue to follow the same old failed policies, and... Read moreThe 11 April 2013 by Jobsanger
MOST POPULAR FROM POLITICS
- Fighting Kleptocracy by Center For International Private Enterprise
- NDC Policy Department Issues Statement Trashing ROK for Artillery Drill by Michael_nklw
- Hillary Clinton Is Trusted The Most To Handle Terrorist Threat by Jobsanger
- Kim Jong Un watches a concert given by KPA service member... by Michael_nklw
MOST RECOMMENDED IN POLITICS
- Why Paris Reveals the Horror – and the Hypocrisies – of Global Terrorism by Andrewgavinmarshall
- The hounding of Sandy Hook skeptics: Halbig threatened; Amazon.com removes NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK by Eowyn
- Shocking video shows Europe’s “refugee crisis” is a Muslim invasion by Eowyn
- Video of missile (?) hitting Pentagon on 9/11 by Eowyn
ON THE POLITICS FORUM
- I Admire Bernie For His Honesty ... Reviewed by Monica Leschen
- Vanuatu Daily News Digest | 10 ... Reviewed by Mr
- 7th All-Pakistan Secretary Generals’ Conference 2015 Reviewed by Christal Skillen
- April fools day in Russia Reviewed by Bertha Kiernan