Environment Magazine

Classics: Demography Versus Genetics

Posted on the 15 March 2011 by Bradshaw @conservbytes

Here’s another short, but sweet Conservation Classic highlighted in our upcoming book chapter (see previous entries on this book). Today’s entry comes from long-time quantitative ecology guru, Russ Lande, who is now based at the Silwood Park Campus (Imperial College London).

Classics: demography versus genetics


In an influential review, Lande (1988) argued that

“…demography may usually be of more immediate importance than population genetics in determining the minimum viable size of wild populations”.

It was a well-reasoned case, and was widely interpreted to mean that demographic and ecological threats would provide the ‘killer blow’ to threatened species before genetic factors such as inbreeding and fitness effects of loss of genetic diversity had time to exert a major influence on small population dynamics.

Lande’s paper ignited a fire under the belly of conservation geneticists, and led to a concerted effort to come up with stronger evidence for the role of genetics in elevating extinction risk. This in turn resulted in innovative field experiments (Saccheri et al., 1998), meta-analyses on genetically effective population size (Frankham 1995), studies on the enhanced effect of inbreeding on wild populations (Crnokrak & Roff, 1999), and a pairwise comparison of 170 threatened taxa showing that the majority had indeed suffered from a reduction genetic diversity compared to their non-threatened congeners (Spielman et al., 2004).

The net conclusion is that demographic and genetic changes can work in concert in small populations to threaten their viability and survival (Mills & Smouse, 1994).

CJA Bradshaw, NS Sodhi, WF Laurance, BW Brook

ResearchBlogging.orgLande, R. (1988). Genetics and demography in biological conservation Science, 241 (4872), 1455-1460 DOI: 10.1126/science.3420403

You Might Also Like :

Back to Featured Articles on Logo Paperblog

These articles might interest you :

  • Koalas Are Fading Away

    Koalas Fading Away

    GR: I would add that not only are habitat losses causing greater short-term harm than climate change, so are invasive species. Read more

    By  Garry Rogers
  • Inaugural Environmental Arsehat of the Year

    Inaugural Environmental Arsehat Year

    As you recall, I asked both for your nominations and your votes for the inaugural Environmental Arsehat of the Year. Nominees could be a person or an entity... Read more

    By  Bradshaw
  • First Patch Walk of 2017

    First Patch Walk 2017

    After dropping the little lady at school for the first time this year I thought what better way to spend my first child free time in weeks out on the patch,... Read more

    By  Ashley Crombet-Beolens
  • Maps Reveal How Global Consumption Hurts Wildlife

    Maps Reveal Global Consumption Hurts Wildlife

    Map shows species-threat hot spots linked to consumption in the United States. The scale bars indicate the total of all the fractions of threats to land or... Read more

    By  Garry Rogers
  • The Conservation Status Of Christmas Wildlife

    Conservation Status Christmas Wildlife

    Colder weather is no problem for well adapted winter species around Christmas time, but what threatens the species that we usually associate with the festive... Read more

    By  Frontiergap
  • 35 Reasons Why We Need to Be Environmentally Conscious

    Reasons Need Environmentally Conscious

    It is critical to protect the environment so as to reduce the destruction of eco-systems caused by a myriad of anthropogenic activities. Read more

    By  Rinkesh
  • Taking My Breath Away

    Taking Breath Away

    As a wildlife watcher there are spectacles I have seen that have taken my breath away, from thousands of Pink-footed geese taking to flight in the setting sun,... Read more

    By  Ashley Crombet-Beolens