Debate Magazine

Animist Theory of Mind (Nietzsche)

By Cris

As regular readers know, over the past few months I’ve been digging around the early literature on the origins, evolution, and history of what we we today call “religion.” In addition to the well known classics (David Hume, Charles Darwin, Edward Tylor, Emile Durkheim, and James Frazer), this literature includes lesser known work by early anthropologists such as RR Marett and John Lubbock.

As regular readers also know, I’m finding that these foundational figures have already thought and written about most of the things that have preoccupied cognitive and evolutionary scholars of religion over the past 15 years. The main differences seem to be that the old-timers didn’t have access to modern neuroscientific terminology or equipment, didn’t experiment with undergraduates or children, and didn’t run statistical tests on data. Other than these differences, much of what is ostensibly new in cognitive and evolutionary religious studies is actually quite old.

There was one thing, however, that I thought was truly new. This is the idea that “theory of mind” — the ability to attribute mental states to others and understand that others can have mental states different from one’s own — plays a key role in animist and religious thinking. Theory of mind research has been raging over the past few decades and continues unabated. So it must be new, right? Wrong.

Yesterday I was reading “Nietzsche’s Debt to Lubbock” (Thatcher 1983) and was chagrined to learn that Nietzsche argued this long ago:

Now man believed originally that wherever he saw something happen, a will had to be at work in the background as a cause, and a personal, willing being. Any notion of mechanics was far from his mind. But since man believed, for immense periods of time, only in persons [i.e., minds] (and not in substances, forces, things, and so forth), the faith in cause and effect became for him the basic faith that he applies wherever anything happens — and this is what he still does instinctively: it is an atavism of the most ancient origin. (Gay Science, aphorism 127).

Ancestral humans, in other words, “supposed that the mind was everywhere” and then “projected” mind onto everything (Dawn of Day, aphs. 31,17). Not convinced that Nietzsche is contemplating what we would today call “theory of mind”? Try this:

In the inner psychic economy of the primitive man, fear of evil predominates. What is evil? Three things: chance, the uncertain, the sudden. How does primitive man fight against evil? He conceives it as reason, as power, even as a person [i.e., mind]. In this way he establishes the possibility of entering into a kind of treaty with it and in general to exercise influence over it in advance — to forestall it. (Will to Power, aph. 1019).

This is theory of mind. Nietzsche clearly thinks it key to animist-religious ideation. He is in good company with modern scholars, many of whom argue the same thing with different language. I should have known.

Animist Theory of Mind (Nietzsche)


You Might Also Like :

Back to Featured Articles on Logo Paperblog

These articles might interest you :

  • Theory of Ritualized Behavior

    Theory Ritualized Behavior

    In my anthropology of religion course, we are now looking at ritual. While preparing for class, I reviewed a recent synopsis of ritual theory which is so good... Read more

    By  Cris
  • Ten Stages of Mind Development

    Stages Mind Development

    “Yes. There is more. Ego apprehends. Ego grasps, attaches, and possesses. It is a possessor of possessors, most insidious. There are entities that possess the... Read more

    By  Tantrawave
  • Insurrection Theory

    Time to repost something of Laci's from back in September of 2009. It addresses recent comments by both Crunchy and Civillian76, that show a lack of depth in ou... Read more

    By  Mikeb302000
  • A Theory

    I have this theory which I can't really prove, but I would like to throw out for someone to look into:The rise of the lunatic right in the US and the... Read more

    By  Mikeb302000
  • Assemblage Theory

    Assemblage Theory

    Deleuze's theory (metaphor?) of assemblage as a way of thinking about the social world is an intriguing one. Fundamentally the idea is that there does not... Read more

    By  Dlittle30
  • Historians of Sociology and Classical Social Theory

    Historians Sociology Classical Social Theory

    Several readers of the recent post on Raymond Aron asked about other surveys of the history of sociology that are sometimes considered helpful. So I've pulled... Read more

    By  Dlittle30
  • Aesthetics Versus Literary Theory

    In email conversation with Joe Hughes recently, check out his two books on Deleuze they are excellent by the way, I tried to explain a long-term project I am... Read more

    By  Williamwatkin